Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs. Yamaha R1 2020

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha R1 2020

Yamaha R1 2020

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs Yamaha R1 2020

The Yamaha MT-09 2017 and the Yamaha R1 2020 are two different models with distinct features and specifications.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 is equipped with a 847cc engine that produces 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. It has a bore of 78 mm and a stroke of 59.1 mm, with a compression ratio of 11.5. The bike has 3 cylinders and 4 valves per cylinder, with a DOHC configuration. The cooling system is liquid-based. On the other hand, the Yamaha R1 2020 has a more powerful 998cc engine that generates 200 horsepower and 112.4 Nm of torque. It has a larger bore of 79 mm and a shorter stroke of 50.9 mm, resulting in a higher compression ratio of 13. Similar to the MT-09, the R1 also has 4 valves per cylinder and a DOHC configuration, with liquid cooling.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. The MT-09 2017 has an Öhlins suspension, which provides an extreme enhancement to the bike's performance. On the other hand, the R1 2020 has a standard suspension setup, which is stable and reliable.

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Both bikes have an aluminum frame, but the MT-09 2017 has a twin-tube frame type, while the R1 2020 has a Deltabox frame type. The twin-tube frame of the MT-09 offers excellent stability and maneuverability, while the Deltabox frame of the R1 provides a wonderfully noble overall impression.

In terms of brakes, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front. The Yamaha MT-09 2017 is equipped with a Magura HC3 radial brake pump, which works divinely and offers excellent braking performance. However, the Yamaha R1 2020's brakes are not 100 per cent satisfactory on the race track, indicating a slight weakness in this area.

Yamaha R1 2020

Yamaha R1 2020

Both bikes come with advanced rider assistance systems. The MT-09 2017 features ABS, Quickshifter, and Traction control, while the R1 2020 offers Launch-Control and Traction control. The R1's electronics are of high quality and provide a clean response, enhancing the overall riding experience.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the MT-09 2017 has a wheelbase of 1440 mm and a seat height of 815 mm. It has a kerb weight of 193 kg and a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters. On the other hand, the R1 2020 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1405 mm and a higher seat height of 855 mm. It has a kerb weight of 199 kg and a larger fuel tank capacity of 17 liters.

In summary, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 is a naked bike with a powerful engine and advanced rider assistance systems. It offers excellent suspension and braking performance, with a focus on aesthetics and customization options. On the other hand, the Yamaha R1 2020 is a supersport bike with a more powerful engine and high-quality electronics. It provides a stable chassis and a wonderfully noble overall impression. However, it may have some limitations in terms of braking performance on the race track.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2017 compared to Yamaha R1 2020

Yamaha MT-09 2017
Yamaha R1 2020

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore78 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke50.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power200 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,500 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque112.4 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque11,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio13
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement998 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDeltabox

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Quickshifter, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsLaunch-Control, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,055 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth690 mm
HeightHeight1,120 mmHeight1,150 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height855 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)193 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)199 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In conclusion, after several stops throughout the season, I can look back on a great result. Both in terms of performance and looks, our MT-09 is perfect. The suspension was probably our most important issue. Where before there was clearly (too much) movement in the rear in fast corners, now it is ironed over without batting an eyelid. The STX 46 shock absorber is quite stiff in its basic configuration, but also manages to get through everyday life without being uncomfortable. Thanks to generous adjustment options, there is still room for individual preferences and uses. The function of the NIX 30 cartridge is also impressive. The response behaviour - especially under load - has improved significantly. There is now also much more reserve available when braking. Where before the fork went into block and the ABS triggered when braking hard with the original set-up, now the brakes simply continue to work effectively. In addition, the MT-09 now follows the intended line in the curve radius as if by itself - a pure pleasure. The sight and sound of the Akrapovic complete system are also pure joy, and the fact that it produces a few more horsepower is felt effectively, especially in the upper third of the rev range. The front wheel shoots even more willingly into the gallery in 2nd and 3rd gear.

Öhlins suspension an extreme enrichment

thanks to Akrapovic now optics and sound are right

Magura HC3 radial brake pump works divinely

Carbon2Race covers offer grandiose optics

combination of seat, footrests and handlebar clamps very effective

Financial outlay

lots of working time

certain parts must be registered

ECU Flash not road legal

Yamaha R1 2020

Yamaha R1 2020

The Yamaha YZF-R1 is mature and makes countless racetrack pilots happy. The engine shines with lightness and agility, the seating position surprises positively and the handling is radical but still "suitable for the masses". The machine immediately stands out visually and also because of the heart-warming sound. Especially on the country road, the bike scores with its well-known strengths: great engine, great electronics, great package! A real pleasure to ride!

powerful engine

clean response

great but not intrusive sound

stable chassis

high-quality electronics

wonderfully noble overall impression

Brake not 100 per cent satisfactory on the race track

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Yamaha R1

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2017 and a Yamaha R1 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha R1 2020 is about 161% higher. A Yamaha MT-09 2017 experiences a loss of 810 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,240 USD for a Yamaha R1 2020. Compared to Yamaha R1 2020 there are more Yamaha MT-09 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 9. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 73 days compared to 86 days for a Yamaha R1. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 80 reviews for the Yamaha R1 since model year 2005. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 6/10/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 3,900 views for the first review on Yamaha R1 published on 4/28/2003.

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha R1

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH