BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. SWM Ace of Spades 125 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

SWM Ace of Spades 125 2020

SWM Ace of Spades 125 2020

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs SWM Ace of Spades 125 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

SWM Ace of Spades 125 2020

SWM Ace of Spades 125 2020

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2016 compared to SWM Ace of Spades 125 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2016
SWM Ace of Spades 125 2020

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore58 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke47.2 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power15 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque11 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement124.7 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter46 mmDiameter41 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsCombined Brake System

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,078 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth808 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,386 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height790 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA1

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

SWM Ace of Spades 125 2020

SWM Ace of Spades 125 2020

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs SWM Ace of Spades 125

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price SWM Ace of Spades 125

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH