Yamaha MT-10 2016 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-10 2016 vs Yamaha MT-09 2013

The Yamaha MT-10 2016 and the Yamaha MT-09 2013 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, but they have several differences in terms of specifications, strengths, and weaknesses.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-10 2016 has a significant advantage with 160 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2013's 115 HP. This means that the MT-10 will offer more acceleration and top speed capabilities. The torque of the MT-10 is also higher at 111 Nm compared to the MT-09's 87.5 Nm. The MT-10 has four cylinders and a displacement of 998ccm, while the MT-09 has three cylinders and a displacement of 847ccm. This indicates that the MT-10 will provide a smoother and more powerful performance.

In terms of suspension, the MT-10 has an upside-down telescopic fork at the front, which offers better stability and control compared to the telescopic fork of the MT-09. Both bikes have an aluminum frame, but the MT-10 has a Deltabox frame, which is known for its rigidity and stability, while the MT-09 has a Twin Tube frame. This suggests that the MT-10 will have better handling and stability.

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front, providing strong braking power. The front tire width is the same for both bikes at 120mm, but the rear tire width is wider on the MT-10 at 190mm compared to the MT-09's 180mm. This wider rear tire on the MT-10 will offer better grip and stability during cornering.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the MT-10 has a slightly shorter wheelbase at 1400mm compared to the MT-09's 1440mm. The seat height of the MT-10 is also slightly higher at 825mm compared to the MT-09's 815mm. The MT-10 is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 210kg compared to the MT-09's 191kg. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 17 liters for the MT-10 and 14 liters for the MT-09.

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

The MT-10 has strengths such as its CP4 engine, which provides a strong character and unmistakable sound. It is also extremely agile and offers high-speed stability. The strong brakes of the MT-10 contribute to its overall performance. On the other hand, the MT-10 has weaknesses in terms of comfort, limited wind protection, and a hard fit.

The MT-09 has the advantage of a reasonable price and a powerful engine. However, it has weaknesses such as a hard chassis and high fuel consumption.

In conclusion, the Yamaha MT-10 2016 is a more powerful and advanced model compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2013. It offers better performance, handling, and stability. However, the MT-10 may lack in terms of comfort and wind protection. The MT-09, on the other hand, is more affordable and has a powerful engine, but it may have some drawbacks in terms of chassis and fuel consumption.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-10 2016 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-10 2016
Yamaha MT-09 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque111 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,095 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth800 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,110 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,400 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)210 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)191 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-10 2016

Yamaha MT-10 2016

The short and stocky MT-10 is the furthest away from the R1 superbike of the renowned power naked bikes, both in terms of looks and chassis, but the heart of the MT-10 is directly descended from the racetrack weapon and fascinates with a uniquely raw sound and power from below thanks to the typical crank pin offset, which, with a modified firing order, ensures this unique character. The resulting 160 hp therefore only seem a little weak on paper compared to the more than 200 hp of the R1, in reality the MT-10 also ignites incredible fireworks. The suspension would probably be too soft for the race track, but it is just right for a country road fight, and the brakes do the same - probably only acceptable for the track, but perfect for the country road.

CP4 engine

strong character

extremely agile

high-speed stability

strong brakes

unmistakable sound

Poor comfort

limited wind protection

hard fit

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

The start is frightening - abandonment of 1st gear.

Reasonable price

powerful engine

Hard chassis

high consumption

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-10 vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-10 2016 and a Yamaha MT-09 2013. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 7. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 52 days compared to 97 days for the Yamaha MT-10. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 32 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Yamaha MT-10 was published on 11/17/2015 and now has more than 20,700 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.

Price Yamaha MT-10

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH