Husqvarna TE 125 2016 vs. Husqvarna CR 125 2009

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna CR 125 2009

Husqvarna CR 125 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 125 2016 vs Husqvarna CR 125 2009

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna CR 125 2009

Husqvarna CR 125 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 125 2016 compared to Husqvarna CR 125 2009

Husqvarna TE 125 2016
Husqvarna CR 125 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke54.5 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
DisplacementDisplacement124.8 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandWPBrandSachs

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandSachs

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter19 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,471 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height960 mmSeat Height985 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight96 kgDry Weight98 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity7 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

The beginner enduro for riders who want to do everything right from the start. Does not forgive shifting errors and always wants to be ridden in the right rev range. In 2017, the 125 was made even lighter - dry, the 125 weighs just 92 kg.

cheapest model

easy handling

best learning effect

Less forgiving of mistakes

limited engine power

Husqvarna CR 125 2009

Husqvarna CR 125 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH