BMW R 1200 GS 2010 vs. Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014

BMW R 1200 GS 2010

BMW R 1200 GS 2010

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014

Loading...

Overview - BMW R 1200 GS 2010 vs Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014

The BMW R 1200 GS 2010 and the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 are both popular enduro motorcycles that offer a combination of off-road capabilities and on-road comfort. While they have some similarities, there are also notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine and drive train, the BMW R 1200 GS 2010 features a Boxer engine with a bore of 101 mm and a stroke of 73 mm. It has a power output of 110 HP and a torque of 120 Nm. The transmission is a prop shaft, and it has two cylinders with a displacement of 1170 ccm. On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 has an in-line engine with a bore of 74 mm and a stroke of 61.9 mm. It has a slightly lower power output of 95 HP and a torque of 79 Nm. The transmission is a chain, and it has three cylinders with a displacement of 799 ccm.

BMW R 1200 GS 2010

BMW R 1200 GS 2010

In terms of suspension, the BMW R 1200 GS 2010 has a front suspension with a strut design, while the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 features an upside-down telescopic fork. Both models have different frame types, with the BMW having a load-bearing engine frame and the Triumph having a tubular frame.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, the BMW R 1200 GS 2010 has a rear tire width of 110 mm, a wheelbase of 1507 mm, a seat height of 850 mm, a kerb weight of 229 kg, and a fuel tank capacity of 20 l. On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 has a rear tire width of 150 mm, a wheelbase of 1545 mm, a seat height of 845 mm, a kerb weight of 215 kg, and a fuel tank capacity of 19 l.

In terms of strengths, the BMW R 1200 GS 2010 is known for its sporty look, well-equipped features, and ample storage space. On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 is praised for its lively engine, sporty yet comfortable chassis, easy handling, and practical benefits. It also offers a great price/performance ratio.

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014

However, both models have their weaknesses as well. The BMW R 1200 GS 2010 may require some time to get used to the technology of the conversion. On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 has spartan dashboards, and the on-board computer cannot be operated from the end of the handlebar. Additionally, the wind/weather protection is not as great as some riders may prefer.

In conclusion, the BMW R 1200 GS 2010 and the Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014 are both capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities, whether it be sporty looks, equipment, handling, or practicality.

Technical Specifications BMW R 1200 GS 2010 compared to Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014

BMW R 1200 GS 2010
Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeBoxerEngine typeIn line
BoreBore101 mmBore74 mm
StrokeStroke73 mmStroke61.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power110 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,300 rpm
TorqueTorque120 NmTorque79 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,850 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeToughened, DryClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingOil-airCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,170 ccmDisplacement799 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionStrutFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height90 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height70 %
LengthLength2,210 mmLength2,215 mm
WidthWidth915 mmWidth865 mm
HeightHeight1,450 mmHeight1,390 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,507 mmWheelbase1,545 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height850 mmSeat Height845 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight229 kgKerb Weight215 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity19 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R 1200 GS 2010

BMW R 1200 GS 2010

A GS Adventure has practically everything you need for the big trip. But firstly, Touratech manufactures some parts for BMW anyway and secondly, it doesn't stop with the optional extras offered by the Bavarians.

Sporty look

well equipped

enough storage space

The technology of the conversion takes some getting used to

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014

I like the Tiger 800 XC not only on the road for my daily commute to work. It is a very uncomplicated vehicle which, thanks to the powerful and lively engine, is not only very useful but also a lot of fun. On the racetrack, I actually only used the vehicle for my instructor work. But I couldn't help it and had to take to the track once in the faster group. The high-quality chassis and the agile engine were a joy to ride and the Tiger 800 XC is THE universal talent par excellence for me.

lively engine

sporty but comfortable chassis

very easy to handle

lots of practical benefits

great price/performance ratio

Spartan dashboards

on-board computer cannot be operated from the end of the handlebar

wind / weather protection not so great

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R 1200 GS vs Triumph Tiger 800 XC

There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1200 GS 2010 and a Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2014. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 16. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Tiger 800 XC with 48 days compared to 64 days for the BMW R 1200 GS. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 98 reviews for the BMW R 1200 GS and 16 reviews for the Triumph Tiger 800 XC since model year 2011. The first review for the BMW R 1200 GS was published on 1/20/2004 and now has more than 19,100 views. This compares to more than 8,200 views for the first review on Triumph Tiger 800 XC published on 11/1/2010.

Price BMW R 1200 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Tiger 800 XC

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons