Kawasaki Z900 2020 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2016

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2020 vs BMW S 1000 R 2016

The Kawasaki Z900 2020 and the BMW S 1000 R 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, inline four-cylinder engines. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a higher output with 160 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2020's 125.4 HP. The BMW also has a higher torque of 112 Nm compared to the Kawasaki's 98.6 Nm. This means that the BMW will likely offer more acceleration and top speed compared to the Kawasaki.

Both bikes have four cylinders and a displacement of around 1000cc, which provides a good balance between power and efficiency. The Kawasaki has a slightly smaller displacement of 948cc compared to the BMW's 999cc.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. They also both have a monoshock for the rear suspension. This setup provides good stability and control for both models.

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

The chassis of the Kawasaki Z900 2020 is made of steel and has a double cradle frame, while the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. The aluminum frame of the BMW offers a lighter weight and potentially better handling compared to the steel frame of the Kawasaki.

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with four pistons, providing strong and reliable stopping power. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has radial brakes, which offer improved performance and feel compared to the petal brakes of the Kawasaki Z900 2020.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes have ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 also features dynamic suspension, which can automatically adjust the suspension settings based on riding conditions for optimal performance.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. The Kawasaki has a rear tire width of 180mm and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches, while the BMW has a wider rear tire with a width of 190mm. The wheelbase of the Kawasaki is slightly longer at 1450mm compared to the BMW's 1439mm. The seat height of the Kawasaki is lower at 795mm compared to the BMW's 814mm. The Kawasaki also weighs slightly more at 210kg compared to the BMW's 207kg.

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 offers a powerful four-cylinder engine, great handling, good equipment, aggressive looks, and value for money. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a powerful and well-controllable engine, a powerful braking system, and a comfortable seating position.

As for weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 has a somewhat tiring menu navigation and lacks the option for a quickshifter. The BMW S 1000 R 2016, on the other hand, has irresistible but expensive optional extras and a hard chassis.

In conclusion, both the Kawasaki Z900 2020 and the BMW S 1000 R 2016 are powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities, such as desired power output, handling characteristics, and budget.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2020 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016

Kawasaki Z900 2020
BMW S 1000 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter46 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspension

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,057 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth845 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height814 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)210 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

The Kawasaki Z900 may not be up to scratch when it comes to modern, lean angle-dependent electronic features, but it's relatively cheap and you shouldn't underestimate the fan base of the good old inline four - the Z900 is one of the cheapest ways to own such a great engine with just under a litre of displacement in a sporty naked bike! The higher weight is noticeable, but not massively annoying, because the handling and stability are quite alright. In terms of "outdated" electronics, the most annoying thing is the missing shift assistant, which is not even available as an option. Overall, however, the Z900 is a great naked bike with a great price-performance ratio.

Light and natural handling with high stability

silky engine with full pull from low revs

high chassis transparency, great feedback

seating position with feel-good factor

absolutely fair price.

Relatively cumbersome operation of the menu

no slope-dependent assistance systems

high weight

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

The BMW S 1000 R impresses across the board and is much more than just a naked version of the S 1000 RR. With its own character, more torque in the mid-range and first-class electronics, it sets new standards in the high-performance Naked segment. The overall package of brutal performance, excellent suspension and practical everyday use makes it one of the best naked bikes ever - and at a surprisingly fair price.

Brutal performance with 160 Horsepower

Outstanding DDC suspension

Amazing stability at high speeds for a naked bike

Perfect electronics with sensitive DTC

Good price/performance ratio

Character despite perfection

Driving mode display font too small

Too extreme appearance for BMW traditionalists

Without equipment packages, important electronic features are missing

The price advantage is lost with full features

Price Comparison Average Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2020 and a BMW S 1000 R 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 29% higher. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2020 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 34 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 69 days compared to 124 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons