Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs Yamaha MT-07 2016

The Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and cooling systems. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the XSR900 has a significant advantage with 115 HP compared to the MT-07's 75 HP. This means that the XSR900 will provide a more powerful and thrilling riding experience. The XSR900 also has more torque at 87.5 Nm compared to the MT-07's 68 Nm.

Both bikes have double disk front brakes, ensuring strong stopping power. They also have the same tire width and diameter, providing stability and grip on the road. However, the XSR900 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1440 mm compared to the MT-07's 1400 mm. This may result in slightly different handling characteristics, with the XSR900 potentially feeling more stable at higher speeds.

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

In terms of weight, the MT-07 is lighter at 179 kg compared to the XSR900's 188 kg. This lighter weight, combined with the MT-07's easy handling, makes it a more nimble and agile bike. The MT-07 also has a slightly lower seat height at 805 mm compared to the XSR900's 815 mm, which may be more comfortable for shorter riders.

The XSR900 has a more premium frame made of aluminum, while the MT-07 has a steel frame. This may result in slightly different levels of rigidity and weight distribution, with the XSR900 potentially offering better stability and handling.

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

In terms of design, both bikes have their own unique aesthetic. The XSR900 has an authentic modern design, while the MT-07 has an aggressively angular look. However, the XSR900's speedblock design is already present on many other Yamaha models, which may make it less distinctive.

In terms of additional features, both bikes have ABS and TC as standard, ensuring safety and control. The MT-07 also has a comfortable seating position and an extensive and easy-to-read display. The XSR900, on the other hand, has a hard chassis and a seat that could be more comfortable.

Overall, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 offers a more powerful and thrilling riding experience with its higher engine power and torque. It also has a more premium frame and a slightly longer wheelbase, potentially providing better stability. However, the MT-07 2016 is lighter, more agile, and has a more comfortable seating position. It also has an aggressive design and powerful brakes. Both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses, so it ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR900 2016 compared to Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016
Yamaha MT-07 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke68.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power75 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,000 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque68 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement689 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,085 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth745 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,090 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height805 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight188 kgKerb Weight179 kg
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)191 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)182 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

The Yamaha XSR900 is a classic optical illusion - with its round headlight, angular tank and attached tail light, it clearly passes for a retro bike. But it's no coincidence that the performance is reminiscent of the potent mid-range naked bike Yamaha MT-09, which is the extremely sporty basis for the XSR900. So the engine is a blast and the brakes are appropriately venomous. Fortunately, the engineers didn't overdo it with the chassis, the XSR900 offers sufficient comfort and the upright riding position is more comfortable than the powerful engine would lead one to expect. All in all, the XSR900 is one of the sportiest models among the retro bikes.

Extremely sporty and rev-happy engine

excellent brakes

riding at naked bike level

pleasant seating position

high-quality workmanship

price-performance ratio.

almost too direct response

retro style not thought through to the last detail

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Even after three years, the Yamaha MT-07 is still a public favourite. No one else beats such a price-performance ratio. The two-cylinder engine is powerful, but can be dosed very gently at low revs. The display is also one of the best in this class, with good readability. Only the chassis is disappointing. In a sporty riding style, it is simply too soft, which can cause the MT-07 to sway.

great motor

easy to read display

low price

Chassis too soft

Price Comparison Average Market Price Yamaha XSR900 vs Yamaha MT-07

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2016 and a Yamaha MT-07 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha XSR900 2016 is about 12% higher. A Yamaha XSR900 2016 experiences a loss of 1,650 USD in one year and 1,670 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 390 USD and 710 USD for a Yamaha MT-07 2016. Compared to Yamaha MT-07 2016 there are less Yamaha XSR900 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 24. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-07 with 51 days compared to 77 days for the Yamaha XSR900. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 since model year 2013. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 11/25/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 12,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-07 published on 11/4/2013.

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-07

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons