BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs. Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

The BMW S 1000 R 2022 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 are both naked bikes known for their performance and agility. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 takes the lead with 165 HP compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014's 106 HP. This significant difference in power translates to a more exhilarating and thrilling riding experience on the BMW. Additionally, the BMW has a higher torque of 114 Nm compared to the Triumph's 68 Nm, providing better acceleration and overall performance.

Both bikes feature in-line engines with liquid cooling, ensuring efficient heat dissipation and optimal engine performance. However, the BMW has four cylinders and a larger displacement of 999 ccm, while the Triumph has three cylinders and a displacement of 675 ccm. The additional cylinder and larger displacement of the BMW contribute to its higher power output.

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, the BMW offers more adjustability with compression, preload, and rebound adjustments for both the front and rear suspension. The Triumph, on the other hand, only offers compression and rebound adjustments for the front and rear suspension. This gives the BMW an advantage in terms of fine-tuning the suspension to suit individual riding preferences and road conditions.

Both bikes have twin tube frames, providing a solid and stable chassis. The BMW has four-piston radial brakes at the front, offering strong and precise stopping power. The Triumph also has four-piston radial brakes, which are known for their brute stopping power. However, it should be noted that the Triumph's brakes may not be suitable for beginners due to their aggressive nature.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front tire widths of 120 mm and front tire diameters of 17 inches. However, the BMW has a wider rear tire of 190 mm compared to the Triumph's 180 mm. The BMW also has a longer wheelbase of 1450 mm compared to the Triumph's 1410 mm, which contributes to its stability and handling.

In terms of seat height, the BMW has a slightly higher seat height of 830 mm compared to the Triumph's 800 mm. This may be a factor to consider for riders with shorter inseams. Additionally, the Triumph has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.4 liters compared to the BMW's 16.5 liters, providing a slightly longer range between refueling stops.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 is praised for its powerful engine, strong brakes, comfortable ergonomics, good standard equipment, and extensive range of accessories. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 is commended for its ease of handling, rev-happy engine, wonderful three-cylinder sound, brute brakes, and cool streetfighter look.

However, there are also weaknesses to consider. The BMW S 1000 R 2022 is criticized for its sluggish shift assistant and slightly inconsistent optics. The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014, on the other hand, has a hard chassis with modest comfort, a slightly weak engine at the bottom end, can become quite loud over time, and its brakes may not be entirely suitable for beginners.

In conclusion, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014 are both impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers more power, adjustability, and comfort, while the Triumph excels in handling, sound, and aesthetics. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2022 compared to Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2022
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore74 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke52.3 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power106 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,850 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque68 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHC, Drag leverValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement675 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Rebound

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,090 mmLength2,055 mm
WidthWidth812 mmWidth740 mm
HeightHeight1,115 mmHeight1,060 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height800 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014

Every motorcyclist will love the Street Triple R. It was built by enthusiasts. It was built by enthusiasts and conveys the pure pleasure of riding a motorbike without being too demanding.

Extremely easy to handle

rev-happy engine

wonderful three-cylinder sound

brute brakes

cool streetfighter look.

Hard chassis with modest comfort

engine a little weak at the bottom

quite loud over time

brakes not entirely suitable for beginners.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2022 and a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2014. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 22. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 675 R with 60 days compared to 71 days for the BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R since model year 2009. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 13,000 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 675 R published on 7/20/2008.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH