Magazine
Brands
Top Awards
Compare
About us
Home
Compare
Honda CRF250R 2023 vs. Yamaha YZ250F 2023
Husqvarna SM 125 2009 vs. Beta RR Enduro 4T 125 AC 2009
Husqvarna SM 125 2009
Beta RR Enduro 4T 125 AC 2009
Loading...
Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 125 2009 compared to Beta RR Enduro 4T 125 AC 2009
Husqvarna SM 125 2009
Beta RR Enduro 4T 125 AC 2009
Show all
Same only
Differences
Husqvarna SM 125 2009
Beta RR Enduro 4T 125 AC 2009
Engine and Drive Train
Stroke
Stroke
54.5 mm
Stroke
72 mm
Starter
Starter
Kick
Starter
Kick
Displacement
Displacement
124 ccm
Displacement
54 ccm
Brakes Rear
Type
Type
Disc
Type
Disc
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre diameter
Front tyre diameter
17 inch
Front tyre diameter
21 inch
Rear tyre diameter
Rear tyre diameter
17 inch
Rear tyre diameter
18 inch
Wheelbase
Wheelbase
1,470 mm
Wheelbase
1,370 mm
Seat Height
Seat Height
870 mm
Seat Height
933 mm
Dry Weight
Dry Weight
113 kg
Dry Weight
103 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity
Fuel Tank Capacity
9.5 l
Fuel Tank Capacity
6 l
Alternative Comparisons
VS.
Husqvarna SM 125 S 2005 vs
Husqvarna SM 125 2009
VS.
Yamaha MT-125 2021 vs
Beta RR Enduro 4T 125 AC 2017
VS.
Beta RR Enduro 4T 125 AC 2015 vs
Beta RR 125 LC Motard 2021
VS.
Yamaha DT 125 X 2005 vs
Husqvarna SM 125 2009
VS.
Husqvarna WR 125 2010 vs
Husqvarna SM 125 2009
VS.
Husqvarna SM 125 2009 vs
KTM 125 EXC 2013
VS.
Brixton Cromwell 125 2020 vs
Beta RR Enduro 4T 125 AC 2018
VS.
Beta RR Enduro 4T 125 AC 2016 vs
Beta RR 125 2T 2020
VS.
Husqvarna SM 125 2009 vs
Fantic XMF 125 Competition 2021
VS.
Husqvarna WRE 125 2005 vs
Husqvarna SM 125 2009
VS.
Beta RR Enduro 4T 125 AC 2016 vs
Beta RR 125 4T 2020
VS.
Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012 vs
Husqvarna SM 125 2009
VS.
Beta RR Enduro 4T 125 AC 2014 vs
Beta RR 125 4T LC Enduro 2022