ChigeeContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHMotorex AG

BMW C 650 GT 2012 vs. Suzuki Burgman 400 2012

BMW C 650 GT 2012

BMW C 650 GT 2012

Suzuki Burgman 400 2012

Suzuki Burgman 400 2012

Loading...

Overview - BMW C 650 GT 2012 vs Suzuki Burgman 400 2012

BMW C 650 GT 2012

BMW C 650 GT 2012

Suzuki Burgman 400 2012

Suzuki Burgman 400 2012

Technical Specifications BMW C 650 GT 2012 compared to Suzuki Burgman 400 2012

BMW C 650 GT 2012
Suzuki Burgman 400 2012
BMW C 650 GT 2012
BMW C 650 GT 2012
Suzuki Burgman 400 2012
Suzuki Burgman 400 2012

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore79 mmBore81 mm
StrokeStroke66 mmStroke77.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power60 HPEngine power34 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,300 rpm
TorqueTorque66 NmTorque36.3 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque5,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.6 Compression Ratio11.2
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionBelt
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeVariomaticTransmission TypeVariomatic
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement647 ccmDisplacement400 ccm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter15 inchFront tyre diameter14 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter15 inchRear tyre diameter13 inch
LengthLength2,218 mmLength2,270 mm
WidthWidth822 mmWidth760 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,591 mmWheelbase1,585 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height780 mmSeat Height710 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)261 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)222 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity13.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW C 650 GT 2012

BMW C 650 GT 2012

It is more pleasant, quieter and has a wider range of use overall. Nevertheless, it is not slower. A really great production that no one would have expected.

Electrically adjustable windshield

bulbous rear

increased storage space

more comfortable seat

extremely fast.

Very heavy

conservative appearance.

Suzuki Burgman 400 2012

Suzuki Burgman 400 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW C 650 GT vs Suzuki Burgman 400

Price BMW C 650 GT

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki Burgman 400

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2020
VS.
Suzuki Burgman 400 2020

Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2020 vs
Suzuki Burgman 400 2020

BMW C 650 GT 2020
VS.
BMW C 400 GT 2020

BMW C 650 GT 2020 vs
BMW C 400 GT 2020

BMW C 650 GT 2020
VS.
BMW C 650 Sport 2016

BMW C 650 GT 2020 vs
BMW C 650 Sport 2016

Malaguti Madison 300 2021
VS.
Suzuki Burgman 400 2021

Malaguti Madison 300 2021 vs
Suzuki Burgman 400 2021

Suzuki Burgman 400 2018
VS.
Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2018

Suzuki Burgman 400 2018 vs
Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2018

BMW C 650 Sport 2020
VS.
BMW C 650 GT 2020

BMW C 650 Sport 2020 vs
BMW C 650 GT 2020

BMW C 650 GT 2020
VS.
Honda X-ADV 2022

BMW C 650 GT 2020 vs
Honda X-ADV 2022

Kymco Xciting S 400i ABS 2019
VS.
Suzuki Burgman 400 2019

Kymco Xciting S 400i ABS 2019 vs
Suzuki Burgman 400 2019

Yamaha XMAX 400 2020
VS.
Suzuki Burgman 400 2020

Yamaha XMAX 400 2020 vs
Suzuki Burgman 400 2020

Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2016
VS.
BMW C 650 GT 2020

Suzuki Burgman 650 Executive 2016 vs
BMW C 650 GT 2020

Suzuki Burgman 400 2021
VS.
BMW C 400 GT 2021

Suzuki Burgman 400 2021 vs
BMW C 400 GT 2021

Yamaha TMAX 560 2021
VS.
BMW C 650 GT 2020

Yamaha TMAX 560 2021 vs
BMW C 650 GT 2020

Honda Forza 350 2021
VS.
Suzuki Burgman 400 2021

Honda Forza 350 2021 vs
Suzuki Burgman 400 2021

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH