Husqvarna FC 350 2019 vs. Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Husqvarna FC 350 2019

Husqvarna FC 350 2019

Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna FC 350 2019 vs Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Husqvarna FC 350 2019

Husqvarna FC 350 2019

Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Technical Specifications Husqvarna FC 350 2019 compared to Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Husqvarna FC 350 2019
Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore88 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke57.5 mmStroke55 mm
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement349.7 ccmDisplacement297 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,485 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height960 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight100.4 kgDry Weight111 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna FC 350 vs Husqvarna TE 310

Price Husqvarna FC 350

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna TE 310

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH