BMW R 1200 R 2010 vs. Triumph Tiger 800 2014

BMW R 1200 R 2010

BMW R 1200 R 2010

Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Loading...

Overview - BMW R 1200 R 2010 vs Triumph Tiger 800 2014

BMW R 1200 R 2010

BMW R 1200 R 2010

Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Technical Specifications BMW R 1200 R 2010 compared to Triumph Tiger 800 2014

BMW R 1200 R 2010
Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeBoxerEngine typeIn line
BoreBore101 mmBore74 mm
StrokeStroke73 mmStroke61.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power109 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,300 rpm
TorqueTorque115 NmTorque79 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,850 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeToughened, DryClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingOil-airCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,170 ccmDisplacement799 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionStrutFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width100 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height70 %
LengthLength2,145 mmLength2,215 mm
WidthWidth872 mmWidth795 mm
HeightHeight1,285 mmHeight1,350 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,530 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height810 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight223 kgKerb Weight210 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity19 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R 1200 R 2010

BMW R 1200 R 2010

The predecessor was already able to be ridden in a sporty manner as well as convincing on tours, the new R 1200 R can do even more - thanks to the pannier system (of course at extra cost), travelling is still no problem, but it masters sport even better. Thanks to the now partially water-cooled boxer twin-cylinder engine, it is wonderfully agile - 125 hp may not seem like much on paper, but the engine pushes incredibly and behaves in a cultivated manner to boot. The chassis and brakes also score highly and the seating position is sporty and upright, covering a wide spectrum from wonderful fun to long-distance touring. Unfortunately, BMW also understands the trick with the surcharge list perfectly. The basic model is well equipped with ABS that can be deactivated, traction control that can also be deactivated and two driving modes, but many interesting gimmicks are almost obligatory - and of course drive the price way up.

Sporty look

powerful engine

good sound

comfortable seating position

ABS and traction control standard

two riding modes

Many cool features only available at extra cost

poorly readable speedometer and rev counter

Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Triumph Tiger 800 2014

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R 1200 R vs Triumph Tiger 800

Price BMW R 1200 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Tiger 800

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH