Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs. Honda CB650F 2017

The Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 and the Honda CB650F 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, displacements, and cooling systems. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Honda CB650F 2017 has a significant advantage with 91 HP compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 72 HP. This higher power output gives the Honda CB650F 2017 an edge in terms of acceleration and top speed.

Despite having less power, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 compensates with a slightly higher torque of 64 Nm compared to the Honda CB650F 2017's 63 Nm. This means that the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 may have better low-end torque and responsiveness at lower revs.

Both bikes feature a monoshock rear suspension and a steel frame, providing stability and control during rides. The front brakes on both models are double disk with double piston calipers, but the Honda CB650F 2017 has the advantage of using wave technology, which enhances braking performance.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

In terms of tire dimensions, the Honda CB650F 2017 has wider tires both at the front (120 mm) and the rear (180 mm) compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 120 mm and 160 mm, respectively. This wider tire setup on the Honda CB650F 2017 may provide better grip and stability during cornering.

The wheelbase of the Honda CB650F 2017 is also slightly longer at 1450 mm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 1410 mm. This longer wheelbase may contribute to better stability at higher speeds.

The seat height of the Honda CB650F 2017 is slightly higher at 810 mm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 805 mm. This may be a consideration for riders with shorter inseams.

In terms of weight, the Honda CB650F 2017 is lighter at 200 kg compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 204 kg. However, when equipped with ABS, the weight of both models becomes equal at 208 kg.

Honda CB650F 2017

The fuel tank capacity of the Honda CB650F 2017 is slightly larger at 17.3 liters compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 16 liters. This may provide a slightly longer range for the Honda CB650F 2017.

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is praised for its solid handling and high-quality level. On the other hand, the Honda CB650F 2017 is commended for its sufficient torque even at low revs, sporty chassis, LED lighting technology, and grown-up look.

As for weaknesses, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is criticized for its weak brake, while the Honda CB650F 2017's display is noted to be difficult to read.

Overall, the Honda CB650F 2017 offers more power, wider tires, a longer wheelbase, and a slightly larger fuel tank capacity compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013. However, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 may have better low-end torque and handling.