Yamaha WR 125 X 2016 vs. Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Yamaha WR 125 X 2016

Yamaha WR 125 X 2016

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha WR 125 X 2016 vs Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Yamaha WR 125 X 2016

Yamaha WR 125 X 2016

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Technical Specifications Yamaha WR 125 X 2016 compared to Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Yamaha WR 125 X 2016
Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Engine and Drive Train

StrokeStroke58.6 mmStroke52 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.2 Compression Ratio10
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124.7 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
LengthLength2,095 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth835 mmWidth820 mm
HeightHeight1,165 mmHeight355 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,430 mmWheelbase1,370 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height875 mmSeat Height890 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight137 kgDry Weight102 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8.5 lFuel Tank Capacity5.7 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha WR 125 X vs Beta RE 125 4T

Price Yamaha WR 125 X

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Beta RE 125 4T

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH