Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2017

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs Kawasaki Z900 2017

In terms of engine specifications, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 have inline engines with liquid cooling. However, there are some differences in power and torque. The Speed Triple has a more powerful engine with 132 HP compared to the Z900's 125.4 HP. Similarly, the Speed Triple has higher torque at 110 Nm compared to the Z900's 98.6 Nm. The Speed Triple has three cylinders, while the Z900 has four.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, there are differences in adjustment options. The Speed Triple offers compression and rebound adjustments for both the front and rear suspension, while the Z900 only offers preload and rebound adjustments for both.

When it comes to the chassis, the Speed Triple has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the Z900 has a steel frame with a double cradle design. This can affect the overall weight and handling of the bikes.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Both bikes have four-piston front brakes, but there are differences in the braking technology. The Speed Triple utilizes radial technology, while the Z900 uses petal technology. This can affect the braking performance and feel.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, there are differences in the rear tire width, with the Speed Triple having a wider 190 mm tire compared to the Z900's 180 mm tire. The wheelbase of the Speed Triple is slightly shorter at 1437 mm compared to the Z900's 1450 mm. Additionally, the seat height of the Speed Triple is higher at 828 mm compared to the Z900's 795 mm.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

In terms of strengths, the Speed Triple is praised for its controlled chassis, hard sound, and stability. On the other hand, the Z900 is praised for its ingenious naked bike chassis, superb looks, and responsive engine with perfectly dimensioned torque. It is also considered to be an optimum intersection of performance, price, and practical use.

However, there are some weaknesses mentioned for both bikes. The Speed Triple is criticized for its rough gearing, which can sometimes disturb the harmony between the rider and the machine. The Z900 is noted to have a narrow knee angle, which may be uncomfortable for taller riders, but this can be addressed by ordering a different seat.

Overall, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses. It ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities in terms of performance, handling, and comfort.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2017

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Kawasaki Z900 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power132 HPEngine power125.4 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque110 NmTorque98.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,700 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,086 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth728 mmWidth820 mm
HeightHeight1,120 mmHeight1,065 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,437 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height828 mmSeat Height795 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.

Controlled chassis

hard sound

stable.

Rough gearing sometimes disturbs the idyll between man and machine.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

An incredibly well-designed motorbike. A lot of test work and attention to detail went into it. It has exactly the right power, exactly the right chassis and exactly the right look. An all-round successful naked bike that will make you happy for a long time. If you like, you can ride it simply and faithfully, but if you want, you can also ride it really fast and it wheels like hell. Great!

Ingenious nakedbike chassis

superb looks

engine responds super fine, revs up willingly and has a perfectly dimensioned torque

optimum intersection of performance, price and practical use

Knee angle very narrow for tall people (order another seat!)

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and a Kawasaki Z900 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2017 is about 37% higher. A Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 experiences a loss of 710 USD in one year and 820 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 520 USD and 920 USD for a Kawasaki Z900 2017. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2017 there are less Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 6 compared to 43. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 77 days compared to 85 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH