Yamaha WR 125 R 2009 vs. Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Yamaha WR 125 R 2009

Yamaha WR 125 R 2009

Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha WR 125 R 2009 vs Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Yamaha WR 125 R 2009

Yamaha WR 125 R 2009

Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Technical Specifications Yamaha WR 125 R 2009 compared to Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Yamaha WR 125 R 2009
Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore52 mmBore97 mm
StrokeStroke58.6 mmStroke67.8 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.2 Compression Ratio12.9
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124.7 ccmDisplacement501 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,430 mmWheelbase1,445 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height930 mmSeat Height920 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight133 kgDry Weight120.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8.5 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha WR 125 R vs Husqvarna SM 510R

Price Yamaha WR 125 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna SM 510R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH