BMW F 800 R 2009 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2017
BMW F 800 R 2009
Kawasaki Z900 2017
Overview - BMW F 800 R 2009 vs Kawasaki Z900 2017
The BMW F 800 R model year 2009 and the Kawasaki Z900 model year 2017 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two.
In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z900 takes the lead with 125.4 HP, while the BMW F 800 R falls behind with 87 HP. This means that the Z900 offers more power and potentially better acceleration compared to the F 800 R. The torque figures also favor the Z900, with 98.6 Nm compared to the F 800 R's 86 Nm.
Both bikes have in-line engines and four-piston double disk front brakes, providing good stopping power. The front and rear tire diameters are the same for both models, measuring 17 inches. However, there is a slight difference in the wheelbase, with the BMW F 800 R having a longer wheelbase of 1520 mm compared to the Z900's 1450 mm. This may affect the handling and maneuverability of the bikes.
BMW F 800 R 2009
In terms of seat height, the BMW F 800 R has a higher seat at 820 mm compared to the Z900's 795 mm. This may be more comfortable for taller riders on the F 800 R, while the Z900 may be more suitable for shorter riders.
Looking at the strengths of the BMW F 800 R, it is praised for its high-quality components, great engine performance, and the possibility of good equipment options. The cockpit and chassis are also highlighted as positive aspects, along with its low fuel consumption.
Kawasaki Z900 2017
On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 is commended for its ingenious naked bike chassis, superb looks, and a responsive engine with perfectly dimensioned torque. It is also noted as offering an optimum intersection of performance, price, and practical use.
In terms of weaknesses, the BMW F 800 R is criticized for its high price, a first gear that may be too long, and its optics. The Kawasaki Z900's main weakness is mentioned as the narrow knee angle, which may be uncomfortable for taller riders. However, it is suggested that ordering a different seat can alleviate this issue.
Overall, the Kawasaki Z900 seems to have the advantage in terms of engine power and torque, while the BMW F 800 R offers high-quality components and good fuel efficiency. The choice between the two may come down to personal preferences, riding style, and budget.
Technical Specifications BMW F 800 R 2009 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2017
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW F 800 R 2009
In the advertisements, the new BMW F 800 R sometimes comes across as a woman's motorbike. This does not do the bike an injustice, but the civilised engine, the low seat height and the smooth controls certainly suit petite ladies.
Kawasaki Z900 2017
An incredibly well-designed motorbike. A lot of test work and attention to detail went into it. It has exactly the right power, exactly the right chassis and exactly the right look. An all-round successful naked bike that will make you happy for a long time. If you like, you can ride it simply and faithfully, but if you want, you can also ride it really fast and it wheels like hell. Great!
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 800 R vs Kawasaki Z900
There are a few key differences between a BMW F 800 R 2009 and a Kawasaki Z900 2017. It takes less time to sell a BMW F 800 R with 58 days compared to 85 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the BMW F 800 R was published on 10/10/2008 and now has more than 8,900 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.
