Beta RR 350 4T 2013 vs. Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Loading...

Technical Specifications Beta RR 350 4T 2013 compared to Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Beta RR 350 4T 2013
Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement349.1 ccmDisplacement449 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height940 mmSeat Height975 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight113 kgDry Weight116 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8 lFuel Tank Capacity9 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Very powerful engine and good performance in the MX special stage. Clean straight-line running in deep soil. Swedish steel is back! The Husky brings even heavier kilos wonderfully smoothly through the worst mud pits and up the steep slope without any problems.

Positive handling

low price

stability

decent performance

robust.

Agility

complicated handling - requires strength.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta RR 350 4T vs Husqvarna TE 450

Price Beta RR 350 4T

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna TE 450

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons