Beta RE 125 4T 2009 vs. Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Loading...

Overview - Beta RE 125 4T 2009 vs Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Beta RE 125 4T 2009

Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Technical Specifications Beta RE 125 4T 2009 compared to Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Beta RE 125 4T 2009
Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Engine and Drive Train

StrokeStroke52 mmStroke54.5 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10 Compression Ratio8.8
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,370 mmWheelbase1,465 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height890 mmSeat Height975 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight102 kgDry Weight98 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity5.7 lFuel Tank Capacity7 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta RE 125 4T vs Husqvarna WR 125

Price Beta RE 125 4T

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna WR 125

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH