Husqvarna TE 310 2010 vs. SWM RS 300 R 2017

Husqvarna TE 310 2010

Husqvarna TE 310 2010

SWM RS 300 R 2017

SWM RS 300 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 310 2010 vs SWM RS 300 R 2017

Husqvarna TE 310 2010

Husqvarna TE 310 2010

SWM RS 300 R 2017

SWM RS 300 R 2017

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 310 2010 compared to SWM RS 300 R 2017

Husqvarna TE 310 2010
SWM RS 300 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore83 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke55 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement297 ccmDisplacement298 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandKayaba

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight111 kgDry Weight107 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH