Husqvarna WR 300 2009 vs. Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna WR 300 2009 vs Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 300 2009 compared to Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009
Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72 mmBore97 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke67.8 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric, Kick
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement293 ccmDisplacement510 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandSachsBrandSachs

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandSachsBrandSachs

Brakes Front

TechnologyTechnologyWaveTechnologyWave

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height975 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight104 kgDry Weight112 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna WR 300 vs Husqvarna TE 510

Price Husqvarna WR 300

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna TE 510

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH