BMW R 1250 RT 2023 vs. BMW K 1600 GTL 2023

BMW R 1250 RT 2023

BMW K 1600 GTL 2023
Loading...
Technical Specifications BMW R 1250 RT 2023 compared to BMW K 1600 GTL 2023
BMW R 1250 RT 2023
BMW K 1600 GTL 2023
Engine and Drive Train
| Engine type | Engine type | Boxer | Engine type | In line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bore | Bore | 102.5 mm | Bore | 72 mm |
| Stroke | Stroke | 76 mm | Stroke | 67.5 mm |
| Engine power | Engine power | 136 HP | Engine power | 160.5 HP |
| Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,750 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 6,750 rpm |
| Torque | Torque | 143 Nm | Torque | 180 Nm |
| Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 6,250 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 5,250 rpm |
| Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12.5 | Compression Ratio | 12.2 |
| Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
| Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric |
| Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Antihopping | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
| Transmission | Transmission | Prop shaft | Transmission | Prop shaft |
| Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Gearshift | Transmission Type | Gearshift |
| Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
| Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 6 |
| Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
| Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | DOHC |
| Cooling | Cooling | liquid-air | Cooling | liquid |
| Displacement | Displacement | 1,254 ccm | Displacement | 1,649 ccm |
Suspension Front
| Front suspension | Front suspension | Telelever | Front suspension | Duolever |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travel | Travel | 120 mm | Travel | 115 mm |
Suspension Rear
| Suspension | Suspension | Single swing arm | Suspension | Paralever |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Monoshock | Shock absorber | Monoshock |
| Travel | Travel | 136 mm | Travel | 135 mm |
| Material | Material | Aluminium | Material | Aluminium |
Chassis
| Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Aluminium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rake | Rake | 64.1 degree | Rake | 62.2 degree |
| Trail | Trail | 116 mm | Trail | 106.4 mm |
Brakes Front
| Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 320 mm | Diameter | 320 mm |
| Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
| Actuation | Actuation | Hydraulic | Actuation | Hydraulic |
Brakes Rear
| Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 276 mm | Diameter | 320 mm |
| Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
| Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Fixed caliper |
Assistance Systems
| Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS, Anti-slipping control, Riding modes, Combined Brake System, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Traction control | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS, Suspension electronically adjustable, Riding modes, Combined Brake System, Ride by Wire, Cruise control, Traction control |
|---|
Dimensions and Weights
| Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
| Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
| Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 180 mm | Rear tyre width | 190 mm |
| Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
| Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
| Length | Length | 2,222 mm | Length | 2,489 mm |
| Width | Width | 985 mm | Width | 1,000 mm |
| Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,485 mm | Wheelbase | 1,618 mm |
| Seat Height | Seat Height | 805 mm | Seat Height | 750 mm |
| Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 279 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 358 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 26.5 l |
| Top Speed | Top Speed | 200 km/h | Top Speed | 200 km/h |
| License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
| Combined CO2 emissions | Combined CO2 emissions | 110 g/km | Combined CO2 emissions | 137 g/km |
| Stationary noise | Stationary noise | 92 dB | Stationary noise | 87 dB |
| Stationary noise over 95dB | Stationary noise over 95dB | Stationary noise over 95dB |
Equipment
| Equipment | Equipment | LED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, Sound System, TFT display, Windscreen adjustable | Equipment | Connectivity, Case system, Cornering lights, LED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, Sound System, TFT display, Topcase, Windscreen electronically adjustable |
|---|
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW R 1250 RT 2023

The BMW R 1250 RT simply feels superior when touring. The heavy bike sits compactly in the hand and wags nimbly through the bends. A great touring motorbike.
Great wind and weather protection
Great boxer engine
Powerful acceleration
Easy engine modulation
Well-designed controls
Great integrated luggage
High stability even at high speeds
Somewhat cumbersome when manoeuvring
gear changes at low revs a little choppy
opaque pressure point of the brakes
BMW K 1600 GTL 2023

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R 1250 RT vs BMW K 1600 GTL
Price BMW R 1250 RT
Model year
Current average market prices
Price BMW K 1600 GTL
Model year
Current average market prices
















