KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs. BMW F 800 R 2015

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

BMW F 800 R 2015

BMW F 800 R 2015

Loading...

Overview - KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs BMW F 800 R 2015

The KTM 690 Duke model year 2013 and the BMW F 800 R model year 2015 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW F 800 R takes the lead with 90 HP compared to the KTM 690 Duke's 68 HP. The BMW also has a higher torque of 86 Nm, while the KTM offers 70 Nm. The BMW F 800 R has a twin-cylinder engine with a displacement of 798cc, while the KTM 690 Duke has a single-cylinder engine with a displacement of 690cc.

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension, providing excellent handling and stability. The KTM 690 Duke has a chromium-molybdenum frame, while the BMW F 800 R has an aluminum frame. The BMW's frame is of the twin-tube, load-bearing engine type, which contributes to its overall stability and handling.

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

When it comes to braking, both bikes are equipped with four-piston radial front brakes, ensuring reliable stopping power. The KTM 690 Duke features ride-by-wire technology, which enhances throttle response and control. On the other hand, the BMW F 800 R boasts advanced rider assistance systems such as electronically adjustable suspension, providing a more customizable riding experience.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW F 800 R has a longer wheelbase of 1520mm compared to the KTM 690 Duke's 1466mm. The seat height of the BMW ranges from 790mm to 820mm, while the KTM has a seat height of 835mm. The BMW F 800 R is heavier with a kerb weight of 202kg, while the KTM 690 Duke is lighter at 149.5kg. Both bikes have similar front and rear tire dimensions, with the BMW having a slightly wider rear tire at 180mm compared to the KTM's 160mm.

In terms of fuel capacity, the BMW F 800 R has a slightly larger tank with a capacity of 15 liters, while the KTM 690 Duke has a 14-liter tank.

BMW F 800 R 2015

BMW F 800 R 2015

The KTM 690 Duke's strengths lie in its lightweight design, sufficient power, and low fuel consumption. However, it lacks chassis adjustment options and may not provide the same level of comfort as the BMW F 800 R.

On the other hand, the BMW F 800 R offers high-quality equipment such as ESA (electronic suspension adjustment), RDC (tire pressure monitoring), and ASC (automatic stability control). It is a very versatile bike that can be used for various riding styles and offers a comfortable yet fast riding experience. However, it may become relatively expensive when adding all the optional extras, and it may not have the same cult following as bikes like the Ducati Monster or Triumph Street Triple.

In conclusion, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 and the BMW F 800 R 2015 are both excellent naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The KTM is lighter and more fuel-efficient, while the BMW offers a higher level of equipment and versatility. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications KTM 690 Duke 2013 compared to BMW F 800 R 2015

KTM 690 Duke 2013
BMW F 800 R 2015

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore102 mmBore82 mm
StrokeStroke84.5 mmStroke75.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power68 HPEngine power90 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque70 NmTorque86 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque5,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.6 Compression Ratio12.02
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement690 ccmDisplacement798 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsRide by WireAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsSuspension electronically adjustable

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,466 mmWheelbase1,520 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height790,770,820 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight149.5 kgKerb Weight202 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

For pure fun, the 690 Duke without the R is already sufficient. The potent single-cylinder engine is almost identical, as is the weight and handling, and the appearance is too similar to be a real selling point for the 690 Duke R.

Light weight

sufficient power

low consumption

No chassis adjustment possible

low comfort

BMW F 800 R 2015

BMW F 800 R 2015

The F 800 R is a motorbike without any real weaknesses, but remains rather unobtrusive overall even after the update. A very positive feature is the overall equipment, which is of very high quality in this league.

High-quality equipment such as ESA, RDC and ASC

very universally usable

fast to ride and still comfortable

The affordable entry-level bike becomes relatively high-priced when you implement all the extras

terrific on paper and while riding, but it lacks that certain something to become "cult" like a Monster or a Street Triple.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 690 Duke vs BMW F 800 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2013 and a BMW F 800 R 2015. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW F 800 R 2015 is about 34% higher. A KTM 690 Duke 2013 experiences a loss of 200 USD in one year and 610 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 270 USD and 540 USD for a BMW F 800 R 2015. Compared to BMW F 800 R 2015 there are less KTM 690 Duke 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 9 compared to 14. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke with 60 days compared to 89 days for a BMW F 800 R. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R since model year 2009. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 9/28/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 8,900 views for the first review on BMW F 800 R published on 10/10/2008.

Price KTM 690 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 800 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH