Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2017
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
Yamaha MT-07 2017
Overview - Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 vs Yamaha MT-07 2017
The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 and the Yamaha MT-07 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, liquid cooling, and similar front and rear tire dimensions. However, there are several key differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a significant advantage with 106 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2017's 75 HP. This higher power output gives the Triumph a more exhilarating and thrilling riding experience, especially in terms of acceleration and top speed.
Both bikes have the same torque rating of 68 Nm, which ensures good low-end power and responsiveness. However, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has an additional cylinder, with a total of three cylinders compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2017's two cylinders. This extra cylinder provides smoother power delivery and a more refined engine performance.
In terms of suspension, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 features an Upside-Down telescopic fork, which offers better damping and improved handling compared to the telescopic fork on the Yamaha MT-07 2017. This translates to more precise and responsive steering for the Triumph.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
Both bikes have similar front and rear tire dimensions, with a width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. This ensures good grip and stability on the road for both models. The wheelbase is slightly longer on the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 at 1410 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2017's 1400 mm. This longer wheelbase contributes to the Triumph's stability at high speeds.
In terms of seat height, the Yamaha MT-07 2017 has a slightly higher seat at 805 mm compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013's 800 mm. This may be more comfortable for taller riders on the Yamaha.
The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a higher kerb weight at 183 kg compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2017's 179 kg. This slightly heavier weight may affect the agility and maneuverability of the Triumph, although it is still considered lightweight for its class.
Yamaha MT-07 2017
In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a larger tank at 17.4 liters compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2017's 14 liters. This gives the Triumph a longer range and reduces the frequency of refueling.
In terms of strengths, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 is praised for its taut, playful chassis, agile handling, low weight, powerful brakes, and overall comfort. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 2017 is commended for its great motor, easy-to-read display, and low price.
However, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a weakness in its brake application, which can be a little brute towards the end. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 2017 has a weakness in its chassis, which is considered too soft. This may affect the bike's stability and handling in certain situations.
In conclusion, while both the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 and the Yamaha MT-07 2017 are capable naked bikes, the Triumph offers a more powerful and refined engine, better suspension, and a larger fuel tank. However, the Yamaha has its strengths in terms of its motor, display, and affordability. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 compared to Yamaha MT-07 2017
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013
If you're looking for a lively naked bike in the mid-range segment that's especially fun for sporty rides on country roads, the Street Triple 675 R is the perfect choice. Whether the manageable surcharge for the R pays off should be decided according to whether you really want to adjust the chassis or leave it in the well-chosen basic setup anyway.
Yamaha MT-07 2017
Even after three years, the Yamaha MT-07 is still a public favourite. No one else beats such a price-performance ratio. The two-cylinder engine is powerful, but can be dosed very gently at low revs. The display is also one of the best in this class, with good readability. Only the chassis is disappointing. In a sporty riding style, it is simply too soft, which can cause the MT-07 to sway.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R vs Yamaha MT-07
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 and a Yamaha MT-07 2017. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 675 R with 52 days compared to 83 days for a Yamaha MT-07. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R and 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 since model year 2013. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R was published on 7/20/2008 and now has more than 13,000 views. This compares to more than 12,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-07 published on 11/4/2013.
