Beta Evo 300 2T 2013 vs. KTM Freeride 350 2016

Beta Evo 300 2T 2013

Beta Evo 300 2T 2013

KTM Freeride 350 2016

KTM Freeride 350 2016

Loading...

Overview - Beta Evo 300 2T 2013 vs KTM Freeride 350 2016

Beta Evo 300 2T 2013

Beta Evo 300 2T 2013

KTM Freeride 350 2016

KTM Freeride 350 2016

Technical Specifications Beta Evo 300 2T 2013 compared to KTM Freeride 350 2016

Beta Evo 300 2T 2013
KTM Freeride 350 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore79 mmBore88 mm
StrokeStroke60.5 mmStroke57.5 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.2 Compression Ratio12.3
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement296.4 ccmDisplacement349.7 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typePerimeter

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width110 mm
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,305 mmWheelbase1,418 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height660 mmSeat Height915 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight68.5 kgDry Weight99.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity2.6 lFuel Tank Capacity5.5 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta Evo 300 2T vs KTM Freeride 350

Price Beta Evo 300 2T

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM Freeride 350

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH