Suzuki SV 650 2016 vs. Ducati Monster 1000 2005

Suzuki SV 650 2016

Suzuki SV 650 2016

Ducati Monster 1000 2005

Ducati Monster 1000 2005

Loading...

Technical Specifications Suzuki SV 650 2016 compared to Ducati Monster 1000 2005

Suzuki SV 650 2016
Ducati Monster 1000 2005

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power76 HPEngine power94 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingOil-air
DisplacementDisplacement645 ccmDisplacement992 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,445 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height800 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity13.8 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki SV 650 2016

Suzuki SV 650 2016

The new SV650 continues the visual minimalism of the first two SV650 generations, but builds technically on its direct predecessor, the SFV650 Gladius - two excellent moves that turn the very modern SV650 into a classic. The design fits wonderfully into the era of many retro conversions, but inside there are also modern gimmicks that make it easier for beginners in particular to get started. The engine, on the other hand, can also convince advanced riders; the typical V2 feeling is wonderful. You shouldn't expect extreme sportiness in the chassis and brakes, but the price of just under 6400 euros (in Germany) is a statement that the competition will have to swallow.

Agile, powerful engine

typical V2 sound

pleasant and low seating position

easy handling

comfortable chassis

brakes with good control

Poorly readable digital tachometer

Ducati Monster 1000 2005

Ducati Monster 1000 2005

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki SV 650 vs Ducati Monster 1000

Price Suzuki SV 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Ducati Monster 1000

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons