Honda CB500F 2013 vs. Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020

Loading...

Overview - Honda CB500F 2013 vs Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020

The Honda CB500F 2013 and the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine configurations. The Honda CB500F 2013 is equipped with a liquid-cooled, inline twin-cylinder engine with a displacement of 471cc, producing 48 horsepower and 43 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020 features an oil-air cooled, inline twin-cylinder engine with a larger displacement of 648cc, delivering slightly lower power at 47 horsepower but higher torque at 52 Nm.

In terms of braking performance, both motorcycles are equipped with front single disc brakes with double piston calipers. This ensures effective stopping power and enhances safety during riding.

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

When it comes to dimensions and weights, the Honda CB500F 2013 has a front tire width of 120mm and rear tire width of 160mm, both with a diameter of 17 inches. It has a wheelbase of 1410mm and a seat height of 790mm. The fuel tank capacity is 15.7 liters. On the other hand, the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020 has a narrower front tire width of 100mm and rear tire width of 130mm, both with a diameter of 18 inches. It has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1400mm and a higher seat height of 804mm. The fuel tank capacity is 13.7 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Honda CB500F 2013 is known for its relatively low overall weight, which contributes to its agility and nimble handling. It also has an acceptable chassis and provides good comfort for the rider. The engine of the CB500F is strong and delivers ample power. Additionally, the seating position of the CB500F is well-designed and successful.

On the other hand, the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020 boasts a refined engine that offers a smooth and enjoyable riding experience. The relaxed seating position of the Interceptor 650 provides comfort for long rides. The brakes on the Interceptor 650 are also commendable, ensuring reliable stopping power. The classic round instruments and authentic retro look of the Interceptor 650 add to its appeal.

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020

However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses. The Honda CB500F 2013 is criticized for its partially shoddy workmanship, which may affect its overall durability and reliability. It also lacks a gear indicator, which can be inconvenient for some riders. On the other hand, the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020 has a chassis that may not withstand a sporty driving style, limiting its performance potential. Additionally, the seat of the Interceptor 650 is reported to be uncomfortable during long rides.

In conclusion, the Honda CB500F 2013 and the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020 are both capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The CB500F offers a strong engine and agile handling, while the Interceptor 650 provides a refined engine and a comfortable riding position. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Honda CB500F 2013 compared to Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020

Honda CB500F 2013
Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line crankpin offset
BoreBore67 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke66.8 mmStroke67.8 mm
Engine powerEngine power48 HPEngine power47 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power5,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,100 rpm
TorqueTorque43 NmTorque52 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque4,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.7 Compression Ratio9.5
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric, Kick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigital, TransistorIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesOHV
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingOil-air
DisplacementDisplacement471 ccmDisplacement648 ccm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width100 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter18 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width130 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,122 mm
WidthWidth780 mmWidth789 mm
HeightHeight1,060 mmHeight1,165 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height804 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.7 lFuel Tank Capacity13.7 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

However, such minor details cannot tarnish the good image of the Honda CB500F. After the first few metres, there was no question that it would be an excellent choice as an entry-level motorbike. But the fact that it can also meet higher demands is a little surprising, especially the engine pleases with its agile response and pronounced revving pleasure.

Relatively low overall weight

agile

nimble handling

acceptable chassis

good comfort

strong engine

successful seating position.

Partially shoddy workmanship

lack of gear indicator.

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020

The Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 offers a very coherent overall package in the retro segment. A relaxed seating position, lots of chrome and the cultivated two-cylinder make it a pretty object of desire that also stands up to everyday use. You won't find any modern features, but with an output of 47 hp, traction control and riding modes would be superfluous anyway. If you long for decelerated, relaxed cruising and purist motorcycling, you will definitely be happy with the Interceptor 650.

Refined engine Relaxed seating position Good brakes Classic round instruments Authentic retro look

Chassis does not withstand sporty driving style

seat uncomfortable in the long run

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda CB500F vs Royal Enfield Interceptor 650

There are a few key differences between a Honda CB500F 2013 and a Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020 is about 28% higher. A Honda CB500F 2013 experiences a loss of 530 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 140 USD for a Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020. Compared to Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2020 there are less Honda CB500F 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 8. It takes less time to sell a Honda CB500F with 54 days compared to 179 days for a Royal Enfield Interceptor 650. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 22 reviews for the Honda CB500F and 16 reviews for the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 since model year 2018. The first review for the Honda CB500F was published on 11/10/2012 and now has more than 18,500 views. This compares to more than 133,500 views for the first review on Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 published on 9/28/2018.

Price Honda CB500F

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Royal Enfield Interceptor 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH