Beta Evo 300 2T 2013 vs. Beta Xtrainer 300 2016

Technical Specifications Beta Evo 300 2T 2013 compared to Beta Xtrainer 300 2016

Beta Evo 300 2T 2013

Beta Xtrainer 300 2016

Show all

Same only

Differences

Beta Evo 300 2T 2013

Beta Xtrainer 300 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	79 mm	Bore	72 mm
Stroke	Stroke	60.5 mm	Stroke	72 mm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	10.2	Compression Ratio	11.3
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	2-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	296.4 ccm	Displacement	293.1 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Aluminium	Frame	Steel
Frame type	Frame type	Twin Tube	Frame type	Double cradle

Brakes Front

Piston	Piston	Four pistons	Piston	Double piston

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc
Piston	Piston	Double piston	Piston	Single piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	80 mm	Front tyre width	80 mm
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	110 mm	Rear tyre width	140 mm
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Length	Length	1,990 mm	Length	2,157 mm
Width	Width	850 mm	Width	802 mm
Height	Height	1,115 mm	Height	1,245 mm
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,305 mm	Wheelbase	1,467 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	660 mm	Seat Height	910 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	68.5 kg	Dry Weight	99 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	2.6 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	8.5 l