Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 vs. Yamaha R7 2022

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Yamaha R7 2022

Yamaha R7 2022

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 vs Yamaha R7 2022

In terms of engine specifications, both the Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 and the Yamaha R7 2022 have inline engines with 2 cylinders and 4 valves per cylinder. However, there are some differences in the bore, stroke, and displacement. The Ninja 650 has a bore of 83 mm, a stroke of 60 mm, and a displacement of 649 ccm, while the R7 has a bore of 80 mm, a stroke of 68.6 mm, and a displacement of 689 ccm.

When it comes to engine power, the R7 has a slight advantage with 73.4 HP compared to the Ninja 650's 68.2 HP. The torque figures are also similar, with the R7 producing 67 Nm and the Ninja 650 producing 65.7 Nm. The compression ratio is higher in the R7 at 11.5 compared to the Ninja 650's 10.8.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have a swing arm rear suspension with a monoshock. However, the Ninja 650 has a telescopic fork front suspension with a diameter of 41 mm, while the R7 has an upside-down telescopic fork with the same diameter.

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Both bikes have a steel frame and similar rake angles, with the Ninja 650 having a rake of 65.5 degrees and the R7 having a rake of 66.3 degrees.

When it comes to brakes, both bikes have double disk front brakes. However, the R7 has radial technology for its front brakes, which can provide improved braking performance compared to the Ninja 650's petal brakes.

Both bikes come with ABS as part of their advanced rider assistance systems.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Ninja 650 has a slightly wider rear tire at 160 mm compared to the R7's 180 mm. The wheelbase is also slightly longer in the Ninja 650 at 1410 mm compared to the R7's 1395 mm. The Ninja 650 is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 193 kg compared to the R7's 188 kg. However, the R7 has a smaller fuel tank capacity at 13 liters compared to the Ninja 650's 15 liters.

Yamaha R7 2022

Yamaha R7 2022

In terms of strengths, the Ninja 650 is praised for its transparent chassis for sport, playful and good-natured handling, excellent brakes, sharp looks reminiscent of the ZX-10R, and a resilient engine. On the other hand, the R7 is praised for its CP2 engine with punch from below and in the middle, front-wheel-oriented seating position, adjustable chassis, extremely manageable nature, and good brakes.

As for weaknesses, the Ninja 650 is noted for having little sound from the stock exhaust and slight vibrations from the engine. The R7, on the other hand, is mentioned to lack a TFT display.

Overall, both the Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 and the Yamaha R7 2022 have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them would depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 compared to Yamaha R7 2022

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017
Yamaha R7 2022

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke68.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power68.2 HPEngine power73.4 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,750 rpm
TorqueTorque65.7 NmTorque67 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.8 Compression Ratio11.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement689 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
RakeRake65.5 degreeRake66.3 degree

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,395 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)193 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)188 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity13 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

The Ninja 650 firmly stamps its predecessor (Er-6f). The engine has mastered the Euro 4 hurdle well and serves up a very usable 68 hp, the chassis is simply great for this class, and the weight reduction of 18(!) kilos compared to the ER-6f justifies reverent nods.

Transparent chassis for sport

playful and good-natured handling, excellent brakes, sharp looks a la ZX-10R

resilient engine.

Little sound from the series pot

engine shows slight vibrations

Yamaha R7 2022

Yamaha R7 2022

Those who expect the Yamaha R7 to be a half-hearted solution will be surprised at how well-balanced the little supersports bike is. Of course, the engine with just over 70 hp doesn't have what it takes to challenge the R6, for example, but the engine with its punch from below fits the character perfectly. The chassis components are of high quality, even fully adjustable at the front, and the handling of the slim grenade is absolutely awesome. The seating position is fine, not as radical as on a real super sports bike, and therefore suitable for everyday use.

CP2 engine with punch from below and in the middle

front-wheel oriented seating position

adjustable chassis

extremely manageable

good brakes

No TFT display

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja 650 vs Yamaha R7

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 and a Yamaha R7 2022. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha R7 2022 is about 45% higher. Compared to Yamaha R7 2022 there are less Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 7 compared to 44. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha R7 with 87 days compared to 96 days for the Kawasaki Ninja 650. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja 650 and 9 reviews for the Yamaha R7 since model year 2021. The first review for the Kawasaki Ninja 650 was published on 10/4/2016 and now has more than 79,600 views. This compares to more than 92,800 views for the first review on Yamaha R7 published on 5/18/2021.

Price Kawasaki Ninja 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha R7

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH