Husqvarna SM 610 2009 vs. KTM 390 Duke 2013

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

KTM 390 Duke 2013

Overview - Husqvarna SM 610 2009 vs KTM 390 Duke 2013

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

KTM 390 Duke 2013

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2009 compared to KTM 390 Duke 2013

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

KTM 390 Duke 2013

Show all

Same only

Differences

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

KTM 390 Duke 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	98 mm	Bore	89 mm
Stroke	Stroke	76.4 mm	Stroke	60 mm
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Electric
Displacement	Displacement	576 ccm	Displacement	375 ccm

Suspension Front

Brand	Brand	Sachs	Brand	WP

Suspension Rear

Brand	Brand	Sachs	Brand	WP

Brakes Front

Piston	Piston	Four pistons	Piston	Four pistons

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	17 inch
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,485 mm	Wheelbase	1,367 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	910 mm	Seat Height	800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	12.5 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

KTM 390 Duke 2013

The KTM 390 Duke celebrates the lightness of being.

Light weight

sufficient power

low consumption

No chassis adjustment possible

low comfort

Alternative Comparisons

VS.

KTM 690 Duke 2018 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2018

VS.

Kawasaki Z 400 2020 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2020

VS.

Yamaha MT-03 2020 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2020

VS.

KTM 390 Duke 2020 vs
KTM 390 Adventure 2020

VS.

KTM 390 Duke 2020 vs
KTM RC 390 2020

VS.

BMW G 310 R 2020 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2020

VS.

KTM 390 Duke 2020 vs
KTM 790 Duke 2020

VS.

KTM 390 Duke 2021 vs
Husqvarna Svartpilen 401 2021

VS.

KTM 390 Duke 2021 vs
Yamaha MT-07 2021

VS.

KTM RC 390 2022 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2021

VS.

KTM 390 Duke 2020 vs
Honda CB 500 F 2019

VS.

Kawasaki Z 650 2021 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2021

VS.

Honda CB300R 2020 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2020