Triumph Daytona 675 R 2011 vs. Yamaha XSR900 2020

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2011

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2011

Yamaha XSR900 2020

Yamaha XSR900 2020

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Daytona 675 R 2011 vs Yamaha XSR900 2020

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2011

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2011

Yamaha XSR900 2020

Yamaha XSR900 2020

Technical Specifications Triumph Daytona 675 R 2011 compared to Yamaha XSR900 2020

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2011
Yamaha XSR900 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore74 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke52.3 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power125 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power12,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque72 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,750 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.65 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement675 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,020 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth710 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,120 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,395 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight185 kgKerb Weight188 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.4 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2011

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2011

The designer must have developed roller coasters in the past and know a thing or two about airtime and zero gravity. Just like Triumph knows a thing or two about motorbike construction and Öhlins about suspensions. Added value? Priceless!

High-quality chassis

relatively low weight

good transmission.

Design not too sophisticated

Expensive.

Yamaha XSR900 2020

Yamaha XSR900 2020

The Yamaha XSR900 is a classic optical illusion - with its round headlight, angular tank and attached tail light, it clearly passes for a retro bike. But it's no coincidence that the performance is reminiscent of the potent mid-range naked bike Yamaha MT-09, which is the extremely sporty basis for the XSR900. So the engine is a blast and the brakes are appropriately venomous. Fortunately, the engineers didn't overdo it with the chassis, the XSR900 offers sufficient comfort and the upright riding position is more comfortable than the powerful engine would lead one to expect. All in all, the XSR900 is one of the sportiest models among the retro bikes.

Extremely sporty and rev-happy engine

excellent brakes

riding at naked bike level

pleasant seating position

high-quality workmanship

price-performance ratio.

almost too direct response

retro style not thought through to the last detail

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Daytona 675 R vs Yamaha XSR900

Price Triumph Daytona 675 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH