Yamaha MT-09 2016 vs. Suzuki GSR 750 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Suzuki GSR 750 2017

Suzuki GSR 750 2017

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2016 vs Suzuki GSR 750 2017

In terms of technical specifications, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 and the Suzuki GSR 750 2017 have some similarities. Both bikes have an inline engine type and a front tyre width of 120mm with a diameter of 17 inches. They also share the same rear tyre width and diameter. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

The Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a more powerful engine, with an engine power of 115 HP compared to the Suzuki GSR 750's 106 HP. The Yamaha also has a higher torque of 87.5 Nm compared to the Suzuki's 80 Nm. The Yamaha has a three-cylinder engine with a displacement of 847ccm, while the Suzuki has a four-cylinder engine with a displacement of 749ccm.

In terms of chassis, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has an aluminum frame, while the Suzuki GSR 750 2017 has a steel frame. Both bikes have a twin-tube frame type. The Yamaha has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1440mm compared to the Suzuki's 1450mm. Both bikes have the same seat height of 815mm.

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

When it comes to weight, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 is lighter with a kerb weight of 188kg, while the Suzuki GSR 750 2017 is heavier with a kerb weight of 211kg. The Suzuki also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the Yamaha's 14 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant, three power modes, and a fully adjustable chassis. It also comes with a quickshifter as standard, providing a sporty and convenient riding experience. The bike has a sporty upright seating position, good brakes, and aggressive looks. Additionally, it features traction control, enhancing safety and control.

On the other hand, the Suzuki GSR 750 2017 has an attractive overall appearance and stable handling. The suspension elements have been successfully tuned, providing a comfortable ride. The bike also has easy-to-read instruments, ensuring clear visibility while riding.

Suzuki GSR 750 2017

Suzuki GSR 750 2017

However, there are some weaknesses for each model. The Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a saddle that may be a little too hard for long tours, potentially affecting comfort. Additionally, the license plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one.

The Suzuki GSR 750 2017 has a brake system that requires a lot of manual force, which may be a disadvantage for some riders. The box swingarm is also not particularly aesthetically pleasing.

In conclusion, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 and the Suzuki GSR 750 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha offers a more powerful engine and adjustable chassis, while the Suzuki has an attractive appearance and stable handling. Riders should consider their preferences and priorities when choosing between these two models.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2016 compared to Suzuki GSR 750 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2016
Suzuki GSR 750 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke46 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power106 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,200 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque80 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12.3
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement749 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,115 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth785 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,125 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight188 kgKerb Weight211 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha MT-09 did not need to be reinvented for the coming season - it already was extremely well done almost four years ago. Instead, the Japanese focus on fine-tuning and adding practical, contemporary gimmicks such as traction control and automatic shifting. Due to the Euro4 standard, however, the engine management has been changed once again and offers an emphatically powerful but well controllable power delivery in standard mode; the power explosion of the first generation is now no longer offered even by the sharper A mode. The biggest change, recognisable at first glance, is the, in my opinion, extremely successful design with the more aggressive front and the newly designed rear. All in all, an even snazzier naked bike that was clearly built for the fun of motorcycling.

Wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant

three power modes

fully adjustable chassis

quickshifter as standard

sporty upright seating position

good brakes

aggressive looks

traction control.

Saddle a little too hard for long tours

licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one

Suzuki GSR 750 2017

Suzuki GSR 750 2017

A razor-sharp design with an aggressive front and narrow rear - just as speedy street raiders have always wanted. It is a pity that the rear swingarm was neglected (officially for weight reasons, unofficially for cost reasons), and the front dual-piston brake system seems a little weak. However, the performance during the ride, both at high speed and in tight corners, is quite good.

Attractive overall appearance

stable handling

successful tuning of the suspension elements

sufficient comfort

easy-to-read instruments.

Brake system requires a lot of manual force

box swingarm not particularly pretty

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Suzuki GSR 750

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2016 and a Suzuki GSR 750 2017. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 11. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 87 days compared to 117 days for a Suzuki GSR 750. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 12 reviews for the Suzuki GSR 750 since model year 2011. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 6/10/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 5,400 views for the first review on Suzuki GSR 750 published on 10/5/2010.

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSR 750

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH