Yamaha MT-07 2016 vs. Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-07 2016 vs Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

The Yamaha MT-07 2016 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and front suspension systems. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 has a significant advantage with 135 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2016's 75 HP. Similarly, the torque of the Speed Triple R is much higher at 111 Nm compared to the MT-07's 68 Nm. This means that the Speed Triple R will have more acceleration and power, making it more suitable for riders who enjoy high-speed riding and racing.

The Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a smaller engine displacement of 689ccm compared to the Speed Triple R's 1050ccm. This means that the Speed Triple R will have a higher top speed and potentially better performance overall.

In terms of chassis, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a steel frame while the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 has an aluminum frame. This could result in differences in weight and handling, with the aluminum frame potentially offering better stability and maneuverability.

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front, providing powerful braking capabilities. However, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a slightly smaller front tire width of 120mm compared to the Speed Triple R's 190mm. This could affect the bike's stability and grip on the road.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a shorter wheelbase of 1400mm compared to the Speed Triple R's 1435mm. This could result in differences in handling and stability, with the Speed Triple R potentially offering better stability at higher speeds.

The seat height of the Yamaha MT-07 2016 is slightly lower at 805mm compared to the Speed Triple R's 825mm. This could make the MT-07 more accessible for shorter riders.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Speed Triple R has a larger capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the MT-07's 14 liters. This could result in longer riding range for the Speed Triple R.

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 is praised for its very agile engine, easy handling, low weight, aggressive look, powerful brakes, comfortable seating position, throaty sound, and extensive and easy-to-read display. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 is praised for its flawless racing chassis, precise handling, inspiring looks, great engine, and stable brakes.

However, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 does have some weaknesses, including a slightly soft chassis, footrests that may drag, and some cheap plastic parts. Additionally, the telescopic fork is considered boring by some riders. The Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 has weaknesses in terms of requiring wider radii for turns, being somewhat complicated to ride in turns, and potentially lacking in comfort.

Overall, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 are both capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities, whether it be power and performance or comfort and stability.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-07 2016 compared to Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Yamaha MT-07 2016
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke68.6 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power75 HPEngine power135 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpm
TorqueTorque68 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement689 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,085 mmLength2,100 mm
WidthWidth745 mmWidth795 mm
HeightHeight1,090 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,400 mmWheelbase1,435 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height805 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)182 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)212 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

The MT-07 is an incredible fun machine that is extremely sporty to ride. The brakes pack a punch, the handling is superb and the engine is currently by far the most agile powerplant in this class - and even above.

Very agile engine

very easy handling

low weight

aggressively angular look

powerful brakes

comfortable seating position

throaty sound

extensive and easy-to-read display

Chassis a little soft

Footrests soon drag

partly cheap plastic parts

boring telescopic fork

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

The R rides as precisely and calmly as never before. It is guaranteed to keep its nerve even when the rider may have long since thrown it away. The disadvantage of the compact powerhouse is that the radii have to be a little wider and the course a little faster so that the true Queen of England can also play the 4 aces up her sleeve.

Flawless racing chassis

very precise

relatively stable

inspiring looks

great engine

stable brakes

Requires wide radii

Somewhat complicated to ride in turns

Weaknesses in comfort

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-07 vs Triumph Speed Triple R

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-07 2016 and a Triumph Speed Triple R 2012. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 24. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-07 with 51 days compared to 78 days for a Triumph Speed Triple R. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 and 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R since model year 2012. The first review for the Yamaha MT-07 was published on 11/4/2013 and now has more than 12,600 views. This compares to more than 11,100 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple R published on 10/24/2011.

Price Yamaha MT-07

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH