Kawasaki Z650 2020 vs. Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018

Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z650 2020 vs Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018

The Kawasaki Z650 2020 and the Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018 are both popular models from Kawasaki, but they have some distinct differences in terms of specifications and strengths.

Starting with the engine, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 is equipped with a powerful two-cylinder engine that delivers 68.2 HP of power and 65.7 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018 has a slightly less powerful engine, producing 45 HP of power and 38 Nm of torque. Both bikes have a liquid cooling system and fuel injection, ensuring efficient performance.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature a telescopic fork front suspension and a swing arm rear suspension with preload adjustment. The Kawasaki Z650 2020 has a front suspension diameter of 41 mm, while the Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018 has the same diameter. This ensures a comfortable and stable ride for both models.

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020

When it comes to the chassis, both bikes have a steel tubular frame that provides strength and stability. The Kawasaki Z650 2020 has a slightly larger rake angle of 65.5 degrees compared to the Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018, which has a rake angle of 63 degrees. The Z650 also has a longer wheelbase of 1410 mm, while the Ninja 400 has a wheelbase of 1370 mm. These differences in frame and wheelbase contribute to the handling characteristics of each bike.

In terms of braking, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 is equipped with double disk brakes with a diameter of 300 mm and double piston technology. The Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018, on the other hand, has a single disk brake with a larger diameter of 310 mm and double piston technology. Both models feature petal technology, which enhances the braking performance.

Both bikes are equipped with ABS, providing advanced rider assistance systems for enhanced safety. They also have similar tire sizes, with the Z650 having a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 160 mm, while the Ninja 400 has a front tire width of 110 mm and a rear tire width of 150 mm. Both bikes have a 17-inch tire diameter.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 has a seat height of 790 mm and a kerb weight of 187.1 kg (with ABS). The Ninja 400 2018 has a slightly lower seat height of 785 mm and a lighter kerb weight of 168 kg (with ABS). Both models have a fuel tank capacity of 15 liters for the Z650 and 14 liters for the Ninja 400.

Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018

Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 is praised for its powerful engine, aggressive intake noise, compact dimensions, low seat height, stable chassis, TFT display with connectivity, and grown-up look. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018 is praised for its chassis suitable for sporty use, low weight and effortless handling, engine with smooth response, relaxed and confidence-enhancing seating position, and LED headlights.

However, both models have their weaknesses. The Kawasaki Z650 2020 has been noted to have a front brake pressure point issue, and it may be uncomfortable for taller riders. The Rideology App, although a connectivity feature, is not considered to be 100% sophisticated. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018 has non-adjustable brake and clutch levers, and riders over 180 cm tall may experience excessively loud wind noise with the original windshield.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 and the Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018 are both impressive models with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Z650 offers a more powerful engine and a grown-up look, while the Ninja 400 provides a sporty chassis and effortless handling. Riders should consider their preferences and priorities to choose the model that best suits their needs.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z650 2020 compared to Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018

Kawasaki Z650 2020
Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore70 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke51.8 mm
Engine powerEngine power68.2 HPEngine power45 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque65.7 NmTorque38 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.8 Compression Ratio11.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore36 mmThrottle Bore32 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement399 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel125 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel130 mmTravel132 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentPreload

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular
RakeRake65.5 degreeRake63 degree
TrailTrail100 mmTrail93 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountSemi-SchwimmsattelShock mountSemi-Schwimmsattel
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength1,990 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,370 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height785 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)187.1 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)168 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020

It's simply marvellous what Kawasaki has put together in a complete package with the new Z650. The technical components may not knock your socks off individually, but in combination they make for a pleasantly neutral motorbike that everyone will enjoy. No bitchy idiosyncrasies - simply a naked bike that works really well on winding country roads. Of course, the TFT display, which we don't find in the competition at the moment, is a plus, as is the grown-up look, which is strongly oriented towards the larger Z models. Only the pressure point of the front brake could have been more clearly defined - but you can't have everything in this price range.

powerful two-cylinder engine

aggressive intake noise

compact dimensions

low seat height

stable chassis

TFT display with connectivity

grown-up look

Front brake pressure point

probably uncomfortable for tall riders

Rideology Appn och not 100% sophisticated.

Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018

Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018

In summary, the Ninja 400 could be described as the perfect entry into the supersport world. You can't get more power with A2, the looks suggest much more power, the vehicle is playful to ride, is forgiving in every respect and still allows a really sporty riding style. Those who had legitimate concerns about the lack of power on the various 250 cubic machines now have no more excuses. Ninja 400, it's good to have you!

chassis suitable for sporty use

low weight and correspondingly effortless handling

engine with smooth response

relaxed and confidence-enhancing seating position

LED headlights

Brake and clutch levers not adjustable

enormously loud wind noise with original windshield for riders over 180cm tall

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z650 vs Kawasaki Ninja 400

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z650 2020 and a Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z650 2020 is about 11% higher. A Kawasaki Z650 2020 experiences a loss of 30 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 130 USD for a Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018. Compared to Kawasaki Ninja 400 2018 there are more Kawasaki Z650 2020 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 21 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z650 with 80 days compared to 105 days for a Kawasaki Ninja 400. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 31 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 and 9 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja 400 since model year 2018. The first review for the Kawasaki Z650 was published on 11/8/2016 and now has more than 25,000 views. This compares to more than 44,300 views for the first review on Kawasaki Ninja 400 published on 11/22/2017.

Price Kawasaki Z650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Ninja 400

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH