Husqvarna TE 250 2012 vs. Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2012

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Overview - Husqvarna TE 250 2012 vs Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2012

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Stylish and practical: PRO tank bags from SW-MOTECH

Simple attachment thanks to magnetic snap-in closure. For safe luggage transport.

Details

50 Years Strong: One Brand – One Promise!

Perfect fit, premium quality – with Hepco&Becker accessories, your bike is ready for any adventure. Quality made in Germany.

Details

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 250 2012 compared to Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2012

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2012

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	79 mm	Bore	66.4 mm
Stroke	Stroke	1,000 mm	Stroke	72 mm
Starter	Starter	Kick	Starter	Electric, Kick
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	250 ccm	Displacement	249 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork
Brand	Brand	Kayaba	Brand	WP

Suspension Rear

Brand	Brand	Kayaba	Brand	WP

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	90 mm	Front tyre width	90 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	90 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	120 mm	Rear tyre width	140 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	90 %	Rear tyre height	80 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,470 mm	Wheelbase	1,482 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	950 mm	Seat Height	960 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	106 kg	Dry Weight	104.4 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	7 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 250 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Completely new engine for 2017! Lighter and quieter, thanks to the balancer shaft. In terms of responsiveness, the 250 moves more towards 300. The 250 also has significantly more punch in the lower rev range! The limits between 250 and 300 are now vanishingly small.

Price acquisition

price maintenance

performance

handling

unbeatable in hard terrain

I would prefer a four-stroke on smooth and easy tracks