Husqvarna SM 610 2009 vs. Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2009 compared to Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2009
Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Engine and Drive Train

CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement576 ccmDisplacement628 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,485 mmWheelbase1,481 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height910 mmSeat Height870 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight142.5 kgDry Weight112 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.5 lFuel Tank Capacity9 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

Husaberg FS 650 E 2005

The connoisseur can't stop marvelling at the Husaberg when looking at it. This is not only evident in the purchase price of almost 10,000 euros, but also in the spare parts prices for these noble add-on parts. However, the Berg also offers a famously radical riding experience.

Uncompromising racing iron

tough sound

light weight

engine power

chassis

braking

handling.

Noise, vibrations and spontaneous engine overwhelming for beginners

price

reliability

starting behaviour

Price Comparison Average Market Price Husqvarna SM 610 vs Husaberg FS 650 E

Price Husqvarna SM 610

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husaberg FS 650 E

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons