Beta RR 125 4T 2007 vs. Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Beta RR 125 4T 2007

Beta RR 125 4T 2007

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Loading...

Overview - Beta RR 125 4T 2007 vs Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Beta RR 125 4T 2007

Beta RR 125 4T 2007

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Technical Specifications Beta RR 125 4T 2007 compared to Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Beta RR 125 4T 2007
Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement125 ccmDisplacement124.8 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,365 mmWheelbase1,471 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height935 mmSeat Height960 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight101 kgDry Weight96 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity5.7 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Beta RR 125 4T 2007

Beta RR 125 4T 2007

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

The beginner enduro for riders who want to do everything right from the start. Does not forgive shifting errors and always wants to be ridden in the right rev range. In 2017, the 125 was made even lighter - dry, the 125 weighs just 92 kg.

cheapest model

easy handling

best learning effect

Less forgiving of mistakes

limited engine power

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta RR 125 4T vs Husqvarna TE 125

Price Beta RR 125 4T

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna TE 125

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH