Husqvarna SM 610 2009 vs. KTM 640 LC4 Supermoto 2006

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

KTM 640 LC4 Supermoto 2006

KTM 640 LC4 Supermoto 2006

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 610 2009 vs KTM 640 LC4 Supermoto 2006

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

KTM 640 LC4 Supermoto 2006

KTM 640 LC4 Supermoto 2006

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2009 compared to KTM 640 LC4 Supermoto 2006

Husqvarna SM 610 2009
KTM 640 LC4 Supermoto 2006

Engine and Drive Train

CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement576 ccmDisplacement625 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,485 mmWheelbase1,510 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height910 mmSeat Height910 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight142.5 kgDry Weight149 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.5 lFuel Tank Capacity11.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

KTM 640 LC4 Supermoto 2006

KTM 640 LC4 Supermoto 2006

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Average Market Price Husqvarna SM 610 vs KTM 640 LC4 Supermoto

Price Husqvarna SM 610

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price KTM 640 LC4 Supermoto

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons