Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR900 2016 compared to Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Yamaha XSR900 2016
Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore78 mmBore102 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke84.5 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power74 HP
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12.6
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesRocker arm, OHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement690 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel137 mmTravel275 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
TravelTravel130 mmTravel275 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter300 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter240 mm

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,504 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height910 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)191 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)145 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity13 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

The XSR900 combines the performance of a sporty streetfighter with the look of a pleasing, cleanly finished retro naked bike. In doing so, the Japanese make use of their own history, which can be found bundled and without gaps in the archive of the design agency that has been working for Yamaha for 60 years. It adopts the virtues of the MT-09 and has mended some of its weaknesses. It rides more harmoniously, more controlled and, if desired, more relaxed. Only the comfort, and thus the rider, suffers from the tight chassis on bad roads. You have to be a little bit sensitive when it comes to a neo-classic.

Greedy engine

well-tuned riding modes

ABS and TC as standard

authentic modern design

clean workmanship

hard chassis

seat should be more comfortable

speedblock design already on many other models

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

The Husqvarna 701 Enduro can really do a lot. It rides Hardenduro sections and is a faithful companion in everyday life. On the one hand it is reliable and suitable for everyday use, but on the other hand it is much more radical than "normal" motorbikes. On fast passages, you miss a bit of stability and wind protection / riding comfort. All in all, however, it can do more than the brochure promises.

Extremely powerful and fascinating single-cylinder engine

indestructible and high-quality chassis

hard enduro use possible

awesome wheelie machine.

High seat height, front brake a little too weakly dimensioned for hard road use

unstable at high speeds.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XSR900 vs Husqvarna 701 Enduro

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna 701 Enduro

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH