KTM 390 Duke 2013 vs. BMW G 310 R 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - KTM 390 Duke 2013 vs BMW G 310 R 2016

The KTM 390 Duke 2013 and the BMW G 310 R 2016 are both naked bikes, but they have some key differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has a more powerful engine with 44 HP compared to the BMW G 310 R 2016's 34 HP. The KTM also has a higher torque of 35 Nm compared to the BMW's 28 Nm. Both bikes have a single cylinder engine and a similar displacement, with the KTM at 375 ccm and the BMW at 313 ccm.

Both bikes have upside-down telescopic fork front suspensions and tubular frames. However, the KTM has a chromium-molybdenum frame while the BMW has a steel frame. This could potentially affect the weight and handling of the bikes, with the BMW potentially being lighter and having better handling due to its ingenious chassis.

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

In terms of brakes, both bikes have single disk front brakes and advanced rider assistance systems with ABS. However, the KTM does not have the option for chassis adjustment, which could be a drawback for riders who prefer to customize their bike's suspension.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. The KTM has a slightly shorter wheelbase at 1367 mm compared to the BMW's 1374 mm. The seat height of the KTM is also slightly higher at 800 mm compared to the BMW's 785 mm. Both bikes have the same fuel tank capacity of 11 liters.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 has the advantage of being lightweight, which could make it more agile and easier to handle. It also has sufficient power and a low consumption rate, which could be appealing to riders who want a balance between performance and fuel efficiency.

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

On the other hand, the BMW G 310 R 2016 is praised for its handling, weight, ingenious chassis, and stability. These characteristics could make it a more enjoyable and stable ride, especially for riders who prioritize these aspects.

In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 390 Duke 2013 does not have the option for chassis adjustment, which could limit customization and comfort for some riders. The BMW G 310 R 2016 has a weakness in its brake pedal, although the specific details of this weakness are not provided.

Overall, both the KTM 390 Duke 2013 and the BMW G 310 R 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers more power and a lightweight design, while the BMW offers better handling and stability. Riders should consider their own preferences and priorities when choosing between these two models.

Technical Specifications KTM 390 Duke 2013 compared to BMW G 310 R 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2013
BMW G 310 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore89 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke62 mm
Engine powerEngine power44 HPEngine power34 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque35 NmTorque28 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.6 Compression Ratio10.6
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement375 ccmDisplacement313 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

Shock mountShock mountdirectShock mountdirect

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,367 mmWheelbase1,374 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height785 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 390 Duke 2013

KTM 390 Duke 2013

The KTM 390 Duke celebrates the lightness of being.

Light weight

sufficient power

low consumption

No chassis adjustment possible

low comfort

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

On the first few metres, I briefly thought that the power was a bit lacking. However, after a while it quickly became clear that power is not everything and that ultimate driving pleasure can be guaranteed even with little horsepower. In the US, there are traffic rules called "lane splitting", which means moving forward between cars when there is a traffic jam. Before the traffic lights, for example. I have to admit that I didn't feel so comfortable here at the beginning. A Porsche on the left, a Dodge on the right, you really don't want to swerve with your bike. However, the handlebars of the BMW G310R are rather narrow and you can really cheat your way forward through the queues of cars without a second thought! The only shortcoming I noticed right at the start is the brake pedal. Unfortunately, it's a bit far down. The rear brake was also a little late in engaging. But that can certainly be optimised with an adjustment. All in all, it is a very successful bike. It is super versatile, really fun in every area and you feel comfortable from the first moment! Depending on the rev range you are in, you can adapt the bike to your riding style. Cruising at low revs and super sporty riding at high revs! The perfect all-round roadster at a great price.

Handling

weight

ingenious chassis

stability

Brake pedal

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 390 Duke vs BMW G 310 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 390 Duke 2013 and a BMW G 310 R 2016. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 4. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke and 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R since model year 2016. The first review for the KTM 390 Duke was published on 11/12/2012 and now has more than 26,300 views. This compares to more than 28,500 views for the first review on BMW G 310 R published on 10/7/2015.

Price KTM 390 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW G 310 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH