BMW F 900 R 2020 vs. Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

BMW F 900 R 2020

BMW F 900 R 2020

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 900 R 2020 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

The BMW F 900 R 2020 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line configurations, and liquid cooling systems. However, there are notable differences between the two models in terms of engine power, torque, fuel system, and cylinders.

The BMW F 900 R 2020 is equipped with a 2-cylinder engine that produces 105 HP of power and 92 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 features a 4-cylinder engine that delivers a higher power output of 149 HP and torque of 106 Nm. This indicates that the Suzuki model has a more powerful engine compared to the BMW.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspensions with monoshocks at the rear. They also offer adjustment options for preload and rebound, allowing riders to customize their riding experience.

The chassis of the BMW F 900 R 2020 is made of steel and features a twin-tube, load-bearing engine design. In contrast, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 has an aluminum frame with a twin-tube structure. This suggests that the Suzuki model may have a lighter chassis, potentially contributing to better handling and maneuverability.

BMW F 900 R 2020

BMW F 900 R 2020

Both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes at the front, with a diameter of 320 mm for the BMW and 310 mm for the Suzuki. The brakes on both models use four pistons and radial technology, ensuring efficient and reliable stopping power.

In terms of rider assistance systems, the BMW F 900 R 2020 offers advanced features such as ABS, anti-slipping control, and riding modes. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018, on the other hand, only includes ABS as an advanced rider assistance system.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, the BMW F 900 R 2020 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm, while the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm. Both models have a 17-inch diameter for their front and rear tires. The wheelbase of the BMW is longer at 1518 mm compared to the Suzuki's 1460 mm. Both bikes have the same seat height of 815 mm. The BMW F 900 R 2020 weighs slightly more at 211 kg compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018, which weighs 209 kg. Additionally, the Suzuki has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17 liters, whereas the BMW has a smaller tank with a capacity of 13 liters.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

In terms of strengths, the BMW F 900 R 2020 offers easy handling, high stability, and a chassis with fine response. Its engine is well-behaved, and the brakes are reliable. The bike also has an active yet bearable seating position and a wide range of accessories available.

The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 excels in stable handling, with a sporty engine that delivers an exhilarating riding experience. It has an attractive design and produces a satisfying sound. The bike offers pleasant riding comfort and can be ridden dynamically or calmly, depending on the rider's preference.

As for weaknesses, the BMW F 900 R 2020 has a smaller fuel tank capacity, which may require more frequent refueling. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 is reported to be a little jerky when changing from push to load, and some riders have suggested that a quickshifter with a blipper would enhance its performance.

In conclusion, the BMW F 900 R 2020 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 are both impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers easy handling, stability, and a well-behaved engine, while the Suzuki provides stable handling, a sporty engine, and an attractive design. Riders should consider their specific preferences and priorities when choosing between the two models.

Technical Specifications BMW F 900 R 2020 compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

BMW F 900 R 2020
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore86 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke77 mmStroke59 mm
Engine powerEngine power105 HPEngine power149 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque92 NmTorque106 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.1 Compression Ratio12.2
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
Can be restricted for A2 licenceCan be restricted for A2 licenceYesCan be restricted for A2 licence
DisplacementDisplacement895 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel135 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel142 mmTravel130 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Anti-slipping control, Riding modesAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,140 mmLength2,115 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth795 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,518 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)211 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)209 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity13 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 900 R 2020

BMW F 900 R 2020

The BMW F 900 R offers easy-to-use cornering fun, enormously high stability, an active yet comfortable riding position and a smooth but also unemotional engine. Those who like it fast and twisty will be happy with it. The possibilities for configuration are almost endless but of course not free of charge.

easy handling, high stability

chassis with fine response

well-behaved engine

brakes without blame

active yet bearable seating position

infinitely long list of accessories.

Small tank (13l)

Good engine

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018

The GSX-S 1000 from Suzuki looks sexy, has a powerful sound and really smart hardware. It rides stably, easily and is also fun to ride on tours. If necessary, the engine smokes up violently. But it can also be moved mildly. Compared to the finest Powernakeds, it lacks individual features, but anyone who looks at the price tag will quickly realise: A great choice!

Stable handling inspires confidence

Wonderfully sporty engine

Sexy look and sexy sound

Pleasant riding comfort in the saddle

Rides dynamically but also calmly and serenely - just the way you like it.

A little jerky when changing from push to load

a quickshifter with blipper would be incredibly good for it.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 900 R vs Suzuki GSX-S1000

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 900 R 2020 and a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018. In terms of price, the actual average prices of both motorbikes are almost the same. A BMW F 900 R 2020 experiences a loss of 700 USD in one year and 700 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 270 USD and 1,010 USD for a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018. Compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2018 there are more BMW F 900 R 2020 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 14 compared to 9. It takes less time to sell a BMW F 900 R with 82 days compared to 177 days for a Suzuki GSX-S1000. Since model year 2020 1000PS.de editors have written 24 reviews for the BMW F 900 R and 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 since model year 2015. The first review for the BMW F 900 R was published on 11/5/2019 and now has more than 154,700 views. This compares to more than 17,100 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-S1000 published on 9/27/2014.

Price BMW F 900 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH