Husqvarna SM 610 2007 vs. Husqvarna SM 510R 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2007

Husqvarna SM 610 2007

Husqvarna SM 510R 2009

Husqvarna SM 510R 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2007 compared to Husqvarna SM 510R 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2007
Husqvarna SM 510R 2009

Engine and Drive Train

CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement576 ccmDisplacement501 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,500 mmWheelbase1,445 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height920 mmSeat Height920 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight140 kgDry Weight118 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.5 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2007

Husqvarna SM 610 2007

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Husqvarna SM 510R 2009

Husqvarna SM 510R 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons