Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 vs. Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 vs Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 compared to Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005
Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Engine and Drive Train

CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement449 ccmDisplacement576 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,485 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height885 mmSeat Height910 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight121 kgDry Weight142.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity12.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

In everyday use, experienced pilots immediately feel at ease and have a lot of fun zipping through the traffic. However, inexperienced pilots are somewhat overwhelmed by the spontaneous and sporty characteristics.

Supermoto geometry

handy chassis

high performance

rev-happy engine

Bicycle speedometer looks a bit rancid

reliability

not suitable for everyday use

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Alternative Comparisons