Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs. Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 has a slight advantage with 160 HP compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016's 149 HP. The Yamaha also has a higher torque of 111 Nm compared to the Suzuki's 106 Nm. Both bikes have a 4-cylinder, liquid-cooled engine with fuel injection systems.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. The Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 offers additional adjustments for compression, preload, and rebound on both the front and rear suspension, providing more customization options for the rider. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 only offers adjustments for compression, preload, and rebound on the front suspension.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Both bikes have aluminum frames, but the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 features a Deltabox frame, which is known for its rigidity and stability. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has a twin tube frame.

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with similar diameters. The Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 has slightly larger front disks with a diameter of 320 mm compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016's 310 mm front disks.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes have ABS. However, the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 offers additional features such as electronically adjustable suspension, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 does not have these additional features.

Both bikes have similar dimensions and weights, with 17-inch wheels and a 17-liter fuel tank capacity. The Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1400 mm compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016's 1460 mm. The seat height of the Yamaha is also slightly higher at 825 mm compared to the Suzuki's 815 mm. The kerb weight with ABS is almost the same for both bikes, with the Yamaha weighing 210 kg and the Suzuki weighing 209 kg.

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

In terms of strengths, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 is praised for its powerful engine, good braking control, stable and sensitive chassis, comfortable seating position, and relatively low price. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 is praised for its great chassis, high ride comfort/utility comfort due to the electronic chassis, very emotional but cultivated engine, pleasant wind protection, and balanced overall package despite radical looks and wicked sound.

In terms of weaknesses, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 is criticized for its front end appearance and toxic throttle response in the lower rev range. The Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 is criticized for its traction control not being up to the level of the Aprilia and having too inactive seating position on the racetrack.

Overall, both the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 compared to Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016
Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke59 mmStroke50.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power149 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,500 rpm
TorqueTorque106 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio12
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement998 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel130 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDeltabox

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter320 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter220 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Suspension electronically adjustable, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,095 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth800 mm
HeightHeight1,080 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)209 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Some might be surprised that after waiting so long, Suzuki did not launch the ultimate, uncompromising power naked bike. Instead, the Suzuki GSX-S 1000 with its 149 hp seems almost too well-behaved. But once you ride it on the race track, you quickly realise that the engine is far more powerful in real life and that the rest of the performance of the chassis and braking system is also impressive. In return, it also offers a large portion of everyday and practical suitability - not bad ingredients when you have to cover everything from everyday to race track with a single bike.

Powerful engine

good braking control

stable and sensitive chassis

comfortable seating position

relatively low price.

Front end looks too good

toxic throttle response in the lower rev range

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017

With the SP version, the MT-10 becomes cooler, more desirable and, thanks to the high-quality chassis, better. The semi-active suspension from the R1M is the best in the naked bike league. Highest quality and best function in combination. The chassis also excites on the racetrack. Nevertheless, the MT-10SP is not a racing machine, because the seating position is not active enough for that.

great chassis

high ride comfort / utility comfort due to the electronic chassis

very emotional but nevertheless cultivated engine

pleasant wind protection

balanced overall package despite radical looks and wicked sound

Traction control not up to the level of the Aprilia

Too inactive seating position on the racetrack

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S1000 vs Yamaha MT-10 SP

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and a Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 is about 48% higher. A Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 experiences a loss of 90 USD in one year and 1,330 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 2,320 USD and 1,580 USD for a Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017. Compared to Yamaha MT-10 SP 2017 there are more Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 4. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-S1000 with 109 days compared to 123 days for a Yamaha MT-10 SP. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 and 18 reviews for the Yamaha MT-10 SP since model year 2017. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 was published on 9/27/2014 and now has more than 17,100 views. This compares to more than 28,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-10 SP published on 10/4/2016.

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-10 SP

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH