BMW S 1000 R 2020 vs. Triumph Speed Triple R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2020

Triumph Speed Triple R 2014

Triumph Speed Triple R 2014

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2020 vs Triumph Speed Triple R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2020

Triumph Speed Triple R 2014

Triumph Speed Triple R 2014

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2020 compared to Triumph Speed Triple R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2020
Triumph Speed Triple R 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power135 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,100 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth795 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,435 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)205 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)212 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2020

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Triumph Speed Triple R 2014

Triumph Speed Triple R 2014

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Triumph Speed Triple R

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH