Honda FMX650 2005 vs. Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Honda FMX650 2005

Honda FMX650 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Honda FMX650 2005 compared to Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Honda FMX650 2005
Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Engine and Drive Train

CoolingCoolingAirCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement644 ccmDisplacement576 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,490 mmWheelbase1,485 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height875 mmSeat Height910 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight163 kgDry Weight142.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity12.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda FMX650 2005

Honda FMX650 2005

The bike is nimble in the city, uncomplicated to handle and very frugal in terms of service costs.

Uncomplicated driving pleasure

looks

nice torque curve

beginner-friendly

high-quality chassis

good brake system

easy handling.

Not too high performance

inadvisable for somewhat longer tours.

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Price Comparison Average Market Price Honda FMX650 vs Husqvarna SM 610

Price Honda FMX650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna SM 610

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons