Husqvarna WR 125 2009 vs. Husqvarna FE 450 2019

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Husqvarna FE 450 2019

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 125 2009 compared to Husqvarna FE 450 2019

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Husqvarna FE 450 2019

Show all

Same only

Differences

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Husqvarna FE 450 2019

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	54 mm	Bore	95 mm
Stroke	Stroke	54.5 mm	Stroke	63.4 mm
Starter	Starter	Kick	Starter	Electric
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	124 ccm	Displacement	449.9 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,465 mm	Wheelbase	1,495 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	975 mm	Seat Height	970 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	101 kg	Dry Weight	108.8 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	7 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	8.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna FE 450 2019

The Enduro classic, with sufficient power and excellent controllability

Sufficient power, dosability

On the special stage, she is defeated by the 350cc

Alternative Comparisons

VS.

Husqvarna FE 450 2020 vs
KTM 450 EXC-F 2020

VS.

Husqvarna WR 125 2013 vs
Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

VS.

Husqvarna WRE 125 2013 vs
Husqvarna WR 125 2013

VS.

Husqvarna FE 450 2020 vs
Husaberg FE 450 E 2008

VS.

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2020 vs
Husqvarna FE 450 2021

VS.

Husqvarna FS 450 2021 vs
Husqvarna FE 450 2021

VS.

Husqvarna FE 450 2020 vs
Husaberg FE 450 2013

VS.

KTM 450 EXC-F 2018 vs
Husqvarna FE 450 2016

VS.

Husqvarna WRE 125 2009 vs
Husqvarna WR 125 2013

VS.

Husqvarna WR 125 2008 vs
Husqvarna SM 125 2009

VS.

Husqvarna FE 450 2014 vs
Husaberg FE 450 2009

VS.

KTM 450 EXC-F 2021 vs
Husqvarna FE 450 2021

VS.

Beta RR 125 2T 2021 vs
Husqvarna WR 125 2013