BMW F 800 R 2009 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2016

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 800 R 2009 vs Yamaha MT-09 2016

The BMW F 800 R 2009 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a clear advantage with 115 HP compared to the BMW F 800 R 2009's 87 HP. This means that the Yamaha MT-09 2016 will provide a more powerful and thrilling riding experience.

When it comes to torque, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 also has a slight advantage with 87.5 Nm compared to the BMW F 800 R 2009's 86 Nm. This extra torque will contribute to the Yamaha MT-09 2016's impressive acceleration and responsiveness.

In terms of engine configuration, the BMW F 800 R 2009 has a 2-cylinder engine, while the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a 3-cylinder engine. The additional cylinder in the Yamaha MT-09 2016's engine provides smoother power delivery and a more refined performance.

In terms of displacement, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a larger engine with 847 ccm compared to the BMW F 800 R 2009's 798 ccm. This larger displacement contributes to the Yamaha MT-09 2016's higher power output and overall performance.

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

Both bikes have double disk front brakes, which provide excellent stopping power and control. This is an important feature for a naked bike, as it allows for confident and safe braking.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW F 800 R 2009 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1520 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2016's 1440 mm. This longer wheelbase may contribute to the BMW F 800 R 2009's stability at higher speeds.

In terms of seat height, the BMW F 800 R 2009 has a higher seat height at 820 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2016's 815 mm. This may make the BMW F 800 R 2009 more suitable for taller riders.

When it comes to fuel tank capacity, the BMW F 800 R 2009 has a larger tank with a capacity of 19 liters compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2016's 14 liters. This larger tank capacity may provide the BMW F 800 R 2009 with a longer range between refueling stops.

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

In terms of strengths, the BMW F 800 R 2009 is praised for its high-quality components, great engine performance, and good equipment options. It also has a positive chassis and low fuel consumption, making it an efficient and enjoyable ride.

On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 is praised for its wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant, three power modes, and fully adjustable chassis. It also comes with a quickshifter as standard, providing seamless gear changes. The sporty upright seating position and aggressive looks of the Yamaha MT-09 2016 add to its appeal. Additionally, it features traction control, which enhances safety and control.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW F 800 R 2009 is criticized for its high price and the first gear being a little too long. Some riders also find the optics of the bike to be less appealing.

The Yamaha MT-09 2016, on the other hand, has a saddle that some riders find a little too hard for long tours. Additionally, the license plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one, which may be a minor inconvenience in wet conditions.

Overall, both the BMW F 800 R 2009 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two will ultimately depend on the rider's preferences and priorities, whether it be power, comfort, or aesthetics.

Technical Specifications BMW F 800 R 2009 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016

BMW F 800 R 2009
Yamaha MT-09 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore82 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power87 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque86 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,145 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth905 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,160 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,520 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

In the advertisements, the new BMW F 800 R sometimes comes across as a woman's motorbike. This does not do the bike an injustice, but the civilised engine, the low seat height and the smooth controls certainly suit petite ladies.

High-quality components

great engine

good equipment possible

cockpit

positive chassis

low consumption.

High price

first gear a little too long

optics.

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha MT-09 did not need to be reinvented for the coming season - it already was extremely well done almost four years ago. Instead, the Japanese focus on fine-tuning and adding practical, contemporary gimmicks such as traction control and automatic shifting. Due to the Euro4 standard, however, the engine management has been changed once again and offers an emphatically powerful but well controllable power delivery in standard mode; the power explosion of the first generation is now no longer offered even by the sharper A mode. The biggest change, recognisable at first glance, is the, in my opinion, extremely successful design with the more aggressive front and the newly designed rear. All in all, an even snazzier naked bike that was clearly built for the fun of motorcycling.

Wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant

three power modes

fully adjustable chassis

quickshifter as standard

sporty upright seating position

good brakes

aggressive looks

traction control.

Saddle a little too hard for long tours

licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 800 R vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 800 R 2009 and a Yamaha MT-09 2016. It takes less time to sell a BMW F 800 R with 58 days compared to 87 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW F 800 R was published on 10/10/2008 and now has more than 8,900 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.

Price BMW F 800 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH