Husqvarna FE 250 2016 vs. KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna FE 250 2016 vs KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

The Husqvarna FE 250 2016 and the KTM 250 EXC-F 2016 are both enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. They both have a bore of 78 mm and a stroke of 52.3 mm. They also have a single-cylinder engine with a displacement of 249.91 ccm and a chain transmission. The front suspension on both bikes is an upside-down telescopic fork from WP, and the rear suspension is also from WP. The frame on both bikes is made of steel and has a central tube design.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire diameter of 21 inches and a rear tire diameter of 18 inches. However, the Husqvarna FE 250 has a rear tire width of 120 mm, while the KTM 250 EXC-F has a rear tire width of 140 mm. The wheelbase and seat height are the same for both bikes, with a wheelbase of 1482 mm and a seat height of 970 mm. The dry weight of the Husqvarna FE 250 is 107.5 kg, while the KTM 250 EXC-F is slightly lighter at 105.5 kg. The fuel tank capacity of the Husqvarna FE 250 is 9.5 liters, while the KTM 250 EXC-F has a slightly smaller fuel tank capacity of 9 liters.

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

In terms of strengths, the Husqvarna FE 250 is known for being very easy to ride and is often considered the most beginner-friendly bike. It offers a relaxed ride and is well-suited for riders who are new to enduro motorcycles. On the other hand, the KTM 250 EXC-F is also easy to ride in every respect and offers unbeatable traction and power delivery. It is particularly popular among beginners, as it allows them to hold the line easier than with 2-stroke bikes. Despite being a 4-stroke, it has a similar weight and handling to 2-stroke bikes.

KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

However, the Husqvarna FE 250 does have a weakness in that it can run out of steam on endless steep rides. This means that it may struggle to maintain power and performance in challenging terrain. On the other hand, the KTM 250 EXC-F, while a great bike for beginners, is also almost as expensive as larger enduro bikes. Additionally, lifting the front wheel over obstacles requires better riding technique compared to bikes with larger engines, such as the 350 or 450.

In conclusion, both the Husqvarna FE 250 2016 and the KTM 250 EXC-F 2016 are capable enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. They have their own strengths and weaknesses, with the Husqvarna being more beginner-friendly and relaxed to ride, while the KTM offers unbeatable traction and power delivery. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and riding style.

Technical Specifications Husqvarna FE 250 2016 compared to KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

Husqvarna FE 250 2016
KTM 250 EXC-F 2016
Show all
Same only
Differences
Husqvarna FE 250 2016
Husqvarna FE 250 2016
KTM 250 EXC-F 2016
KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeCentral tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height970 mmSeat Height970 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight107.5 kgDry Weight105.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity9 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

The entry-level four-stroke has also gained some more power. Nevertheless, the 250 remains almost foolproof and easy to ride. Secretly my favourite of the new 2017 models. Combines easy handling with a good-natured yet powerful engine.

Very easy to ride

the most beginner-friendly bike

most relaxed ride

She runs out of steam on endless steep rides

KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

KTM 250 EXC-F 2016

The big 2017 upgrade has been particularly good for the small four-stroke. Because KTM has been able to further increase the power on the lively machine. Now even those riders for whom it was just a tad too weak can try it again. Of course, it has become even more manageable and all the new strengths of the 2017 models also apply to it. But with its 40 hp, it has broadened its target group more than the other 17 models.

Easy to ride - in every respect

traction and power delivery unbeatable

beginners hold the line easier with it than with the 2-strokes

in terms of weight, there is only a slight difference in handling compared to 2-strokes.

Actually a great bike for beginners, but equipped like the "big ones" it is also almost as expensive as a "big" Enduro

Lifting the front wheel over obstacles requires better riding technique than with a 350 or 450.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna FE 250 vs KTM 250 EXC-F

There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna FE 250 2016 and a KTM 250 EXC-F 2016. It takes less time to sell a KTM 250 EXC-F with 44 days compared to 78 days for the Husqvarna FE 250. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the Husqvarna FE 250 and 14 reviews for the KTM 250 EXC-F since model year 2007. The first review for the Husqvarna FE 250 was published on 3/27/2015 and now has more than 48,700 views. This compares to more than 25,200 views for the first review on KTM 250 EXC-F published on 7/5/2006.

Price Husqvarna FE 250

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 250 EXC-F

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberth