Husqvarna TE 510 2009 vs. KTM 690 SMC R 2022

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

KTM 690 SMC R 2022

KTM 690 SMC R 2022

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 510 2009 compared to KTM 690 SMC R 2022

Husqvarna TE 510 2009
KTM 690 SMC R 2022

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore97 mmBore105 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke80 mm
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterElectric
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement510 ccmDisplacement692 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandSachsBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandSachsBrandWP

Brakes Front

TechnologyTechnologyWaveTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,470 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height890 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity13.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

KTM 690 SMC R 2022

KTM 690 SMC R 2022

A large, powerful single cylinder, a stable chassis, just over 160 kg of tractive weight and modern electronics for support - the key data alone suggests a lot of riding pleasure. In 2024, the SMC-R may be a little dusty in some respects and is no longer the undisputed queen of road-legal supermotos, but it can still offer a lot of supermoto fun and performance.

Powerful engine

Electronics can support safety or supermoto manoeuvres as required

Stable, fully adjustable suspension

Agile riding performance

Good ergonomics

Low fuel consumption

Great quickshifter

Old LC display and halogen headlights no longer up to date

Suspension could absorb small bumps more harmoniously

Brakes not overly sensitive

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 510 vs KTM 690 SMC R

Price Husqvarna TE 510

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 690 SMC R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons